Coulter Takes on Colmes

Fox News | 9/27/02 | Aquinasfan

[Aquinasfan]

Coulter: "We have to take out weapons of mass destruction and Hussein."

Colmes: "Just weapons of mass destruction. We have a policy of not targeting heads of government."

Coulter: "Well that's typical for the treason lobby"

Colmes: "The what?"

Coulter:"What about Milosevic?"

Colmes: "It's never been our policy to take out heads of government."

Coulter:"Answer my question. What about Milosevic."

[Aquinasfan]

She's doing great tonight.

[Cicero]

What about Milosevitch, indeed.

It's shameful that Bush hasn't been able to evolve our Balkan policy away from the mess clinton left.

[goodnesswins]

Ah....the "treason lobby" LOL ..... go Ann go

[Mr. Mojo]

Yep, the Congressional Dems were completely gung-ho about initiating a war (in the Balkans) where A) our national security wasn't even remotely threatened, and B) we targeted a single individual (Milosevic). The stench of hypocrisy is overwhelming.

[MichiganCheese]

The 'rats keep referring to Viet Nam in their rhetoric about Trashcanistan and now Iraq. It's no wonder, it is the treason lobbys's only anti-war success. They will not successfully divide our country over this.

If they had guns they would shoot themselves in the foot. I'm not sure why they think that being ant-American will bring them votes from Americans in November.

[Young Werther]

But Clinton promise we would be out by next Christmas. Maybe we can appoint Al Blowhard to be our Ambassador to that god foresaken piece of real estate.

[DWSUWF]

Colmes should have lubed up a charcoal briquette and shoved it up his mohammed before Ann had a go at him.

He could have had it sphinctered down to a nice little diamond by the end of their little 'chat'.

[Steely Tom]

Ann can really be great. She overwhelmed Ex. Senator James Abourezk a couple of nights ago (maybe it was Thursday night) on Shaun Hannity's radio program. She really beat on him, to the point of "piling on" almost, except it was a one-person pile-on!

The only problem witn Ann Coulter is that she gets emotional. She seems to genuinely hate really snarkey, self-satisfied, dishonest liberals, and it shows... Abourezk would make some catty little personal dig against her, just slip it in, and she would really go ballistic, interrupting Hannity and not listening to Aborezk's response.

The thing is, I really felt like she was standing in for me. She really slams these people hard when they talk BS. It's just that her emotional excitement level comes through a little too much, and that cuts down on her impact, although I can't explain just why. Maybe it's just because it makes one a little uncomfortable to listen to someone whose voice quality betrays a supressed desire to lash out and physically smack the person she's talking to.

Not that there's anything wrong with that. Abourzk came across as a real sleaze. He was dishonest in his argument, and tried to stiff-arm both Hannity and Ann on a couple of occaisions. He is a totally committed lobbiest for the Arab side. I'm delighted he's not still in public office.

(steely)

[Mr. Mojo]

Just to be clear about my point "B", we targeted Milosevic, his army, and civilians. .....Christian civilians, while we fought on the side of Muslim terrorists.

[lexington minuteman 1775]

Besides Miloslovik, I think we also tried to take out Quadafi.Didn't we send a missle into one of his tents?

[cricket]

"Ah....the "treason lobby" LOL ..... go Ann go"

Oh that more Repubs had her way - and her nerve with words. . .they do mean things and their truth makes a difference. . .

[Alas Babylon!]

Isn't she wonderful!?

An anology to this would be to say, since I am a murderer, and have murdered many people at different times with my guns, "Let's go into AB's house and take away his guns! Now he won't kill again."

So, after you take my guns, I go out and kill my neighbor with a knife. So, the liberals come in and take my knife. Now I'm no fool, and I know for the right price, someone will sell me a gun, so I buy a gun, and then go kill again....

Isn't the obvious choice to arrest ME for murder? After all, guns don't kill people, people kill people. Saddam is the problem, not his weapons. Great Brittan and France have weapons of mass destruction, but no serious thinking person worries about France launching an unporvoked nuke at someone. Saddam, well, thinking people won't bet that he won't if he gets one, that's for sure.

Really, liberals don't know sh!t from shinola!

[MichiganCheese]

Yeah, go figure. It's time to stop saving Muslim butts and start kicking them.

[CharacterCounts]

Colmes: "Just weapons of mass destruction. We have a policy of not targeting heads of government."

Time for a policy change!

[Liberty Teeth]

The Milosevich argument is slapping the Dems in the face. They were all on-board with Clitler. I remember watching these gasbags like Matthews describe it as a just war. A war that he can side with. No reservations whatsover, full steam ahead.

I also seem to recall some republicans siding with the Crinton.

[Paul Atreides]

That is the first mistake the Republican make, when dealing with the Dims; they deal with them like they are dealing with people who have a sense of honor. The quicker they begin dealing with them like the thugs they are, the better off things will be.

[Paleo Conservative]

This is post #17. Remember the Ann Coulter rule?

[Liberty Teeth]

Is that a case of the repubs playing politics?

[Paul Atreides]

Nah, it's just realizing who the enemy is, rather than deluding themselves into thinking they are dealing with people who are honorable.

[185JHP]

Ann doesn't like evil. Evil is often seen in a most disgusting form in leftists - implacable, relentless, and sneaky. It's not easy to separate the evil machinations (behavior) of a leftist, from the person espousing the evil. It can get personal real easy.