Skip to comments.
Teddy Kennedy on Fox News arguing against war
Fox News
| 9-27-02
| Teddy Kennedy
Posted on 09/27/2002 8:15:41 AM PDT by bonesmccoy
Teddy Kennedy is arguing against military intervention in Iraq. These words transcribed as he speaks... "As I said earlier, we still don't know the fate, location, or operational capacity of Osama Bin Ladin but we do know that Al Queda is still there and here. But, we don't know when where or how this will happen. CIA director has testified that Al Queda remains a serious threat to our country... even if the Taliban out of power.. Afghanistan is still fragile... our reconstruction effort is halting and inadequate...
Some operatives have faded into the woodwork...Karzai is still struggling... Pakistan is far from certain...
United Nations is far from convinced
TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Breaking News; Editorial; Foreign Affairs; Free Republic; Front Page News; Government; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: camelsot; iraq; justiceforsome; maryjoskiller; pudgypudgy2x4; speech; theswimmer
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-275 next last
The Democrats care more about their re-election than having cogent and rational discussion on national security issues.
To: bonesmccoy
Ted Kennedy says, "I am not convinced Iraq has made any progress towards nuclear weapons"
To: bonesmccoy
These guys are on a mission, Democrats are imploding. They wanted the U.N. involved and they are, They wanted Bush to ask for a resolution, He has. These guys are sickening
3
posted on
09/27/2002 8:22:28 AM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: bonesmccoy
He's taking this very seriously: he's even wearing pants.
4
posted on
09/27/2002 8:22:46 AM PDT
by
Petronski
To: bonesmccoy
Dear God in Heaven, I pray that the American people see through this.
5
posted on
09/27/2002 8:23:03 AM PDT
by
alnick
To: bonesmccoy
Some operatives have faded into the woodwork . . . . . . and lots have apparently faded into Iraq for further training.
6
posted on
09/27/2002 8:23:23 AM PDT
by
maryz
To: bonesmccoy
Saddam has to be smiling while hearing this fat @ss spewing on the airwaves
7
posted on
09/27/2002 8:24:07 AM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: bonesmccoy
Democrats in Congress and France and Russia in the UN... America's (and Freedom's) most virulent opponents of the last 50 years once again standing in the way of her defense.
To: MJY1288
It's so transparent. The Democrats are making political hay out of Iraq and pointing fingers at the Pubs. Their polling data must be devastating!
9
posted on
09/27/2002 8:24:33 AM PDT
by
enough
To: alnick
Un-freakin believable!!!!
He just said we shouldn't go because the urban warfare in Baghdad would look like the last 15 minutes of "saving private ryan!!" He's talking about MOVIES for crying out loud!
To: bonesmccoy
I did better than i thought, i got thru sixty seconds before i ran for the barf bag.
To: bonesmccoy
First Scott Ritter, NOW Ted Kennedy. Saddam must be popping open a bottle of Champaign.
sw
12
posted on
09/27/2002 8:25:00 AM PDT
by
spectre
To: bonesmccoy
Teddy Kennedy is arguing against military intervention in Iraq. These words transcribed as he speaks... "As I said earlier, we still don't know the fate, location, or operational capacity of Osama Bin Ladin but we do know that Al Queda is still there and here.Osama is so much pink mist at this point, but who's counting droplets? Al Qaeda is being protected by Iraq, plus it's in Pakistan, Sudan and several other countries. Iraq's the most dangerous of those now, Senator Drunkard!
Afghanistan is still fragile... our reconstruction effort is halting and inadequate...I'm sorry, were you looking for the first Afghan 7-Eleven franchise before or after the next attack on the US?
Some operatives have faded into the woodwork...Karzai is still struggling... Pakistan is far from certain...So, if I understand you right, Ted, we're supposed to put everything on hold until it's right before we go after the next terrorists on the list?
What a maroon! United Nations is far from convinced
13
posted on
09/27/2002 8:25:11 AM PDT
by
mhking
To: maryz
Kennedy: "Israel will retailliate possibly with nuclear weapons... this escalation spirals out of control... there is a fundamental threat to Israel.
Nor can we rule out the possibility that Saddam will assault US forces with chemcial and biolgoical weapons...
Just under 70,000 have been mobilized for the War against Terrorism... if we embark on the war against Iraq... our force strength will be stretched even thinner...
If we must take that course, our burden should be shared with allies and that is less likely if war becomes an immediate response...
To: MJY1288
As I said on the other thread, when the next attack comes, remember it is the Democrats who are leading the charge FOR them.
This is unbelievable.
15
posted on
09/27/2002 8:25:39 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: lexington minuteman 1775
SUMMARYBush did the right thing in Afghanistan, but Iraq would be too hard.
To: MJY1288
Jane Fonda would be proud of Teddy
I wonder who wrote this speech??
17
posted on
09/27/2002 8:26:01 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: bonesmccoy
The rats have alot of nerve. They sit on their hands for 8 years and do nothing to protect our country and now, this entire week, they have critized the Bush administration in an orchestrated attack.
The Bush administration has taken the bull by the horns and are trying to save this country from future attacks.
To: sam_paine
Are those two generals he's talking about active?
19
posted on
09/27/2002 8:26:25 AM PDT
by
Howlin
To: MJY1288
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 261-275 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson