Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Study Suggests Doses of Ecstasy Can Damage Key Brain Areas
Associated Press ^ | September 26, 2002 | Paul Recer

Posted on 09/26/2002 3:18:04 PM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29

WASHINGTON - Partying with Ecstasy several times a night, a common practice among users of the illegal drug, may damage key neurons in the brain and perhaps hasten onset of Parkinson's disease, according to a study in monkeys. But some researchers were skeptical that the results from the animal studies translate to humans and said such studies discourage research that might lead to medical uses for Ecstasy.

A Stanford University researcher injected squirrel monkeys and baboons with three shots of Ecstasy, also known as MDMA, three hours apart, mimicking dosages "often used by MDMA users at all-night dance parties." He said the drug caused enduring damage to dopamine-producing neurons in the brains of the animals.

The damage was still evident two to six weeks later, said Dr. George A. Recaurte, the lead author the study appearing this week in the journal Science. But he said it is not clear if the damaged neurons will repair themselves, a key factor in whether Ecstasy could cause Parkinson's disease.

Parkinson's disease is a brain disorder triggered by the permanent loss of dopamine-producing nerve cells.

"We already know from the literature that brain dopamine declines with age," he said. "A young individual who sustains injury to these dopamine cells and depletes their reserve may be at greater risk of Parkinsonism."

But Julia A. Holland, a psychiatrist on the faculty of the New York University School of Medicine, said earlier studies on humans have failed to show that Ecstasy causes permanent damage to dopamine neurons.

"It is a big leap to extrapolate what he is seeing in these primates and what you expect to see in Parkinson's syndrome," Holland, the author of a book on the risk and recreational use of Ecstasy.

She said Ricaurte's research has helped "demonize" Ecstasy and prevented studies to determine if the drug could be used to treat post traumatic syndrome.

Dr. Alan I. Leshner, former head of the National Institute on Drug Abuse, however, said the Ricaurte study shows "that even an occasional use of Ecstasy can lead to significant damage to brain systems."

Stephen Kish, a University of Toronto researcher studying Parkinson's disease and Ecstasy, said he analyzed the brain of a deceased habitual Ecstasy user two years ago and found no evidence of dopamine neuron damage.

"Ricaurte's findings do raise a concern that Ecstasy may damage the dopamine neurons and potentially cause Parkinson's," said Kish. But he said the current study "might not translate to humans" and has not proven a clear connection between the drug and the brain disease.

In the study, the animals were given six milligrams for every 2.2 pounds of their weight. One of five monkeys and one of five baboons used in the study died shortly after receiving the shots.

The brains of the surviving animals were examined microscopically and chemically after two to eight weeks. The nerve endings where the dopamine is processed were destroyed, said Ricaurte.

"There hasn't been a single animal that escaped the dopamine (cell) lesions," he said.

Ricaurte said the damage was not enough to cause Parkinson's symptoms, but there is "a clinical concern" that repeated use of Ecstasy will diminish the natural reserve of brain cells and lead to early disease.

Holland said Ricaurte's study in monkeys and baboons does not relate to the experience of human recreational users of Ecstasy.

"The dose that he gave killed 20 percent of the animals immediately," said Holland. "Clearly these animals reacted to the drug differently than humans because not one out of five Ecstasy users drops dead."

Also, she said the Stanford study injected Ecstasy, while most human users take the drug orally. Drugs taken orally are less concentrated in the body than drugs that are injected, said Holland.

The NYU psychiatrist said "there is a lot of politics involved" in Ricaurte's study because the government does not want to allow medical research with Ecstasy, even though it has been approved for study by the Food and Drug Administration.

Ricaurte's research has been funded by the National Institute on Drug Abuse, the agency Leshner once headed. Leshner is now chief executive officer of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, the organization that publishes Science, the journal printing Ricaurte's current study on Ecstasy.

---


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: libertarians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

1 posted on 09/26/2002 3:18:04 PM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
This could explain why Parkinsons suddenly is the new disease among 35 and 40 year old Hollywood types.
2 posted on 09/26/2002 3:42:37 PM PDT by Dialup Llama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
I'm trying to imagine Janet Reno on ecstasy, but it just doesn't compute.
3 posted on 09/26/2002 3:44:39 PM PDT by Cicero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29; *libertarians; Kevin Curry; Cultural Jihad
The libertarians will tell you it is a lie. ------------------------------------------------------- [libertarian]

But, But, Ecstacy is good for you. The government needs to stop publishing this propaganda. This is a big lie. Everyone knows that cocaine, heroin, speed, PCP and all the other drugs are good for you and your kids.

We must end the drug war.

I have a right to take PCP and go on a rampage through the town. I have a right to give Esctacy to girls in a nightclub, it is all victimless.

[/libertarian] ---------------------------------------------------------- I wonder if they will ever get it about dope.

4 posted on 09/26/2002 4:05:18 PM PDT by FF578
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
In order to keep people from ingesting a substance that might possibly cause health problems, we, the Imperial Federal Government, do decree those who attempt to ingest or even possess such compounds shall be caged with the most violent criminals we can find for as long as possible.
5 posted on 09/26/2002 4:06:30 PM PDT by Jonathon Spectre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29; Dark Wing; bonesmccoy
Think of it as evolution in action.
6 posted on 09/26/2002 4:24:14 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
Devolution? Perhaps we should create a new ballot proposition... mandatory drug screening of all politicians and elected officials in state and municipal offices. Confirmed positive results will disqualify you from any elected office permanently.
7 posted on 09/26/2002 4:26:00 PM PDT by bonesmccoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FF578
MDMA used to be legal. It still is in many European countries for use in psychological concerns.

What's the different between MDMA and say, Adderal, or Ritilin?

They are both iterations of Amphetamine salts. Go figure.

*REAL* pharmaceutical MDMA is not a danger to the adult human brain unless you abuse it.

8 posted on 09/26/2002 4:32:23 PM PDT by Gorons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Gorons
Cocaine used to be legal too. Until it's harmful effects were discovered.

Are you aware of the Drug Schedule Classes?

Schedule I drugs are drugs that have no accepted medical use, and high dependency. IE: Heroin, LSD.

Schedule II Drugs are drugs that have limited accepted Medical Use, and High dependency. Cocaine.

Schedule III Drugs have medical uses and have less dependency when compared to schedule II.

Schedule IV Drugs have medical uses and less dependency as compared to schedule III. IE: Valium.

Schedule V Drugs have Medical uses and low risk of dependency. IE: Cough Syrup with codeine.

BTW: The majority of what is sold as Esctasy is not MDMA. Many contain amphetamine.

Many states classify Esctasy as Schedule I now.

9 posted on 09/26/2002 4:40:10 PM PDT by FF578
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: FF578
The libertarians will tell you it is a lie.

Well, not being a Libertarian myself, (although I may be a bit of a "l"ibertarian) I don't really give a frog's fat @ss if it causes spontanious combustion. It's none of the government's damn business who smokes, snorts, pops or injects what!! End of story.

10 posted on 09/26/2002 4:44:27 PM PDT by southern rock
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bonesmccoy
Devolution? Perhaps we should create a new ballot proposition... mandatory drug screening of all politicians and elected officials in state and municipal offices. Confirmed positive results will disqualify you from any elected office permanently.

Of course campaign contributions bribes of sufficent quantity can substitute for a clean screening.

11 posted on 09/26/2002 4:46:46 PM PDT by FreeLibertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
This is only anecdotal, but there are two teenagers that are friends of friends that have never been the same since supposedly using Ecstasy. One is a complete zombie who lies immobilized in his bed all day and the other became schizhophrenic (sp?).

If something like this could only possibly happen to people taking this drug, it doesn't sound like a good thing to fool around with.
12 posted on 09/26/2002 4:52:43 PM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
Maybe so. After all, it's completely a man-made chemical, is it not? Too bad they keep blowing their credibility crying wolf with herbal hyperbole.
13 posted on 09/26/2002 4:53:58 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FF578
I consider myself to be a libertarian and your post is a lie.

You have no idea how stupid you sound.
14 posted on 09/26/2002 4:55:38 PM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: FF578
The libertarians will tell you it is a lie.

But, But, Ecstacy is good for you. The government needs to stop publishing this propaganda. This is a big lie. Everyone knows that cocaine, heroin, speed, PCP and all the other drugs are good for you and your kids.

Kindly cite one, single libertarian who has stated the currently illegal chemical substances you list are 'good for you and your kids'.

No, no, I'll wait. Just one will suffice.

15 posted on 09/26/2002 4:59:31 PM PDT by Pahuanui
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: southern rock
I don't think Ecstasy would even exist or if it did, that people would even take it, except for the prohibition on drugs.

Remember stories about Prohibition and all those people being blinded or dying from bad homemade booze?

Those things don't happen anymore since Prohibition was repealed.

It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out why.
16 posted on 09/26/2002 4:59:52 PM PDT by Auntie Mame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
This is only anecdotal, but there are two teenagers that are friends of friends that have never been the same since supposedly using Ecstasy. One is a complete zombie who lies immobilized in his bed all day and the other became schizhophrenic (sp?).

These kids mixed their drugs. What you describe is probably the affects of too much LSD or PCP.

17 posted on 09/26/2002 5:02:03 PM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Sweet_Sunflower29
the government does not want to allow medical research with Ecstasy, even though it has been approved for study by the Food and Drug Administration

Of course they don't. Once the propaganda machine is shown to be erroneous no one is going to buy their crap anymore. It's a power struggle. This isn't about saving us from ourselves this about restricting freedom. What better way than to manufacture a "war on drugs" that keeps a large federal police force active at all times? Since most people do not use "drugs" they are rather apathetic about the whole situation. Once people accept rights violations as commonplace, they are more willing to give up more and more rights. These types are nothing more than punks and cowards.

18 posted on 09/26/2002 5:07:27 PM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
I don't think Ecstasy would even exist or if it did, that people would even take it, except for the prohibition on drugs.

You've obviously never used X before :-) People don't take MDMA because it feels like getting kicked in the head . . .

19 posted on 09/26/2002 5:08:48 PM PDT by realpatriot71
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Auntie Mame
Nobody asked, but as near as I can figure it, a fat-soluble mild drug is tested not only to increase the volume of water-soluble strong stimulant usage, but to further add another motive for the turn. This apparently works well in combination with illegal immigration to drive the economy in a seemingly productive manner.
20 posted on 09/26/2002 5:12:24 PM PDT by apochromat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson