Replies

Well you have a wonderful way of twisting words, don't you? I trust what they say in public.

I twisted no words. My post was forthright. You claimed that the reason for the governments case for war might be based on them having info which they haven't disclosed to the citizens. EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE MADE NO SUCH CLAIMS.

Which means that if that secenerio were true, (unlikely) they would be witholding info and they couldn't be trusted to tell the whole story. I twisted nothing, I asked you a question based on your speculation. I'm sorry if it didn't make you confortable.

You asked for honest replies. I've given you mine. Sorry if you don't agree with it. Didn't expect you to.

We are not here to agree or disagree, we are here to discuss, at least I am. I appreciated that you read the article and have made no personal comments about you. Thank you for your opinions.

If he truely is, then you know our government would be showing us the proof. Do you think they would take all the abuse they have taken from the Dems if they actually had proof? If they had the "smoking guy" you had better believe we would be seeing it.

Are you really so provincial to think that the gov't tells us everything? That they don't keep information classified for the safety of our troops and citizens? Lord, I'm sorry but that is laughable. Gets back to trusting...

You wait for your smoking gun. I've already seen enough bullets to know what caused the gun to smoke.

EVEN THOUGH THEY HAVE MADE NO SUCH CLAIMS

Do you have Security Clearance, and work in the Pentagon? Unless you do, do you think you have a need to know? Or are you one of the Clintonites who tried people in the media, and jeopordize National Security for approval from citizens?