To: Diddle E. Squat
Though actually one could argue better to keep the 19th amendment, but revert back to the voter definition of colonial times: property owners.
To: Diddle E. Squat
If you're going to restrict voting to property owners, then no taxes of any kind can be levied on non-property owners. Property owners would have to pick up sales taxes and the like (if there are any).
11 posted on
09/24/2002 9:09:56 AM PDT by
BikerNYC
To: Diddle E. Squat
...revert back to the voter definition of colonial times: property owners.Right. Since the Constitution originally grants no one the right to vote, all 'voters rights' amendments are political and frivilous IMHO.
57 posted on
09/24/2002 3:28:19 PM PDT by
LisaFab
To: Diddle E. Squat
Though actually one could argue better to keep the 19th amendment, but revert back to the voter definition of colonial times: property owners. Amen to that....or taxpayers in general sans the sales tax.
We would never have to worry about liberalism again....oh goody!! then maybe Conservatives and Libertarians would be able to really duke it out relevantly.
76 posted on
09/25/2002 10:15:03 PM PDT by
wardaddy
To: Diddle E. Squat
I'd settle for just taxpayers
97 posted on
09/29/2002 8:50:36 PM PDT by
rb22982
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson