[Bubba_Leroy]

the state's voyeurism law doesn't apply because the women were taped in a public place, such as a park or shopping mall, where there is no reasonable expectation of privacy

This is too ludicrous for words. If he videotaped women walking around topless or nude, I would agree. If you show it in public then you can't reasonably expect for it to be private. But to rule that you have no expectation of privacy UNDER your clothes?

[13foxtrot]

I am amazed that so many people here on FR do not understand how our legal system works.

The court ruled that the existing statute does not apply to 'upskirt-ing'. Now it is up to the legislature to amend the statute - no big deal. That is how the system is designed to work.

However, it would be nice if this court would apply the same judical restraint when conservative issues come before it.