 AP Photo
|
||||
Posted on 09/23/2002 8:35:11 AM PDT by McGruff
TRENTON, N.J. (AP) - A day before senators headed into a showdown over President Bush ( news - web sites)'s proposal to create a new homeland security department, Bush on Monday said a dispute over labor rights threatened to leave America unprepared to "take the enemy on."
|
||||||
Democrats, who control the Senate by just a one-vote margin, largely oppose Bush's demands to be allowed for reasons of national security to implement a new personnel system in the agency and waive union job rules for the proposed department's 170,000 employees. Bush again threatened, in forceful terms, to veto any bill that does not include those powers.
He was seeking to persuade a few key wavering senators to back a bipartisan Bush-endorsed alternative to the Democratic homeland security bill. Some votes on side issues are expected starting Tuesday after three weeks of debate.
"It's a bill that will make America more secure and anything less than that is a bill which I will not accept," Bush told about 2,000 people gathered in a flag-adorned airport hangar at a New Jersey Army National Guard facility. "We must be flexible, we must be strong. We must be ready to take the enemy on anywhere."
After the campaign-style welcome rally, Bush was heading to a fund-raiser for Republican Douglas Forrester, seeking to unseat embattled Democratic incumbent Sen. Robert Torricelli ( news, bio, voting record).
Bush also chided senators for not sending him legislation he wants that he says will reinvigorate the economy, including energy legislation, a measure guaranteeing terrorism insurance and appropriations bills that include restraints on federal spending.
"What's happening in the economy is not good enough for a stronger America and Congress can help," Bush said at the rally. "What we need in Washington is fiscal responsibility, fiscal sanity. We need to set priorities with your money. And the most important priority I have is to defend the homeland, to defend the homeland from a bunch of killers who hate America."
Bush's policy speech allowed the White House to bill taxpayers for a portion of the otherwise all-political trip.
The Forrester fund-raiser was to be the opening event of an especially heavy week of fund raising for the president, who has blazed new fund-raising records this year.
By gathering $1.5 million Monday for Forrester, according to White House press secretary Ari Fleischer ( news - web sites), Bush raised his total for GOP candidates in this year above $117 million.
And he was showing no signs of a slowdown six weeks before the November election, scheduling four fund-raisers in three states. Bush is aggressively backing Republican candidates in an effort to recapture the Democratic-run Senate, which has been a graveyard for many of his initiatives.
Ousting Torricelli would be particularly sweet for Republicans. Torricelli was chairman of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee in 2000, and helped Democrats gain control of the Senate.
A Star-Ledger/Eagleton-Rutgers poll earlier this month showed the race a statistical dead heat — a dramatic reversal of fortune for Torricelli, who led Forrester by 14 percentage points in June.
In July, the Senate Ethics Committee "severely admonished" Torricelli after finding he accepted and failed to disclose gifts from David Chang, a businessman now serving an 18-month prison sentence for making illegal campaign donations. Forrester has made ethical issues central to his campaign.
Democrats said Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D., would help raise some $500,000 for Torricelli's campaign and the party, and later join New Jersey Gov. James McGreevey and Torricelli at a union rally.
Bush has three other fund-raisers scheduled this week.
On Thursday in Houston, he'll headline his second money-raising event this year for John Cornyn, the GOP Senate nominee in Texas.
On Friday, he'll stump in Denver for Bob Beauprez, a House candidate with no elected experience in a tight contest for a newly created Colorado district.
Later that day, he plans to raise money in Phoenix for Arizona gubernatorial candidate Matt Salmon
That's not what I'm saying. The departments that will fall under this new department already exist, rightly or wrongly. Do you not find it a little disconcerting that a Republican POTUS, who ran on smaller government as one issue, is creating another level of bureaucracy and at the same time circumventing any powers the Legislative Branch of the government might hold over said existing departments? Expansion of the government's power and centralization of said power. That's real conservative
I'm truly beginning to detest many of the Dems -- they're playing politics with our safety -- and the security of this great nation. I have NO patience for that kind of BS. Do they really not get it? Are they too stupid? Or is it just about the power?
We'll see in the coming days just how much the Rats fear W and real Americans.
The Democrat/ABCCBSNBCCNN WPNYT alliance can sweep the Senate debate and outrageous behavior of the rats under the rug pretty easily, and make a W veto look like he is the bad guy with relatively little effort, in spite of Fox News and the internet.
If the GOP isn't willing to buy time on network news broadcsats to tell the American people the truth, the Rats will continue to get away with this.
LOL!!!! Great line!!!
HISSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS!
WHY didn't they EVER point this out when Clinton did it? < sigh >
You been a liberal all your life or you just starting out to look like one? because that was about a bonehead comment some people are so pissed hes doing a great job all thay can do is slur and slam him please before making bonehead comments DONT!!!
You sound a bit wistful there, W1. Too bad we can't put all these foreigners in a good camp somewhere for the duration, eh? Ah for the good ol' days!
You know, talk like that used to be the sure mark of a Republican (back when I was one.) Now it marks you as a conservative. 'Completely diff'rent animal, of course.
Isn't it too bad what FR has degenerated to?
But alas, I'm sure many said the same thing that you say, back when Truman required the miltary heads to reconfigure for streamlining and informational purposes. Furthermore, there is no circumventing the legislative branch involved.
I recommend you check out THIS document. And for further questions, seek out Sally Canfield, Director of Policy and Plans, Office of Homeland Security. The change is needed, overdue, and commonsense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
