Skip to comments.
Language 'no barrier' for Gibson's New Jesus Christ Movie - in Latin
ABC News via Drudge ^
| 9/21/2002
| Staff
Posted on 09/21/2002 12:32:58 PM PDT by ex-Texan
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
1
posted on
09/21/2002 12:32:58 PM PDT
by
ex-Texan
To: 2sheep; Thinkin' Gal; Prodigal Daughter
* ping *
2
posted on
09/21/2002 12:34:30 PM PDT
by
ex-Texan
To: ex-Texan
Mel Gibson is set to direct a movie about Christ's last 12 hours played out entirely in two ancient tongues - Latin and Aramaic - with no subtitles. I don't see how this will work. It may be the greatest film ever made, but most of the world won't know what is being said.
3
posted on
09/21/2002 12:37:48 PM PDT
by
LibKill
To: ex-Texan
So nothing's in English? I wouldn't want to see it.
4
posted on
09/21/2002 12:38:42 PM PDT
by
Sungirl
To: ex-Texan
Does anyone here besides myself, feel that Gibson is missing a once-in-a-lifetime chance to expose millions of viewers to the WORDS of Jesus Christ! What is he thinking??
How can you convey theology or fulfilled prophesy through just actions without words?
5
posted on
09/21/2002 12:40:22 PM PDT
by
berned
To: ex-Texan
Bump for Mel Gibson seems to be a real stand-up guy.
6
posted on
09/21/2002 12:40:41 PM PDT
by
fineright
To: ex-Texan; Askel5; ELS; patent
No subtitles? I need to take an immersion course in Latin soonest.
To: ex-Texan
O tempora, O mores!
Latin??? Why not Greek?
Salve!
8
posted on
09/21/2002 12:41:01 PM PDT
by
meowmeow
To: redlipstick
I tend to think the final product will not be as envisioned by Gibson, but I found this article very interesting.
9
posted on
09/21/2002 12:51:51 PM PDT
by
cyncooper
To: ex-Texan
I think it's a good idea.
I already know the story, would love to hear it in the languages of the day.
I never understand what they are saying in opera, and only half of what's said in rock, so...I'm open to it.
I expect Mel will throw a little Greek in the mix, as it also was a language of commerce in the Holy Land.
He's a ballsy fellow, that Mel.
10
posted on
09/21/2002 12:57:36 PM PDT
by
jwfiv
To: LibKill
I don't see how this will work. It may be the greatest film ever made, but most of the world won't know what is being said. Anybody who has ever sat through readings of Matthew, Mark, Luke and John on Sundays, voluntarily or not, will know what is being said.
To: E. Pluribus Unum
You have a point. Even I could follow along.
It won't reach 1 billion Hindus without subtitles though.
12
posted on
09/21/2002 1:02:28 PM PDT
by
LibKill
To: ex-Texan
"Many people have told the story but ... it's like looking at it from the wrong end of the telescope, I mean Jesus either suffers from bad hair or it's inaccurate or you don't believe it," Very interesting, and potentially brilliant. Sure sounds like he's bending over backward to avoid the cliches -- both spoken and visual -- Hollywood usually uses to deaden the story of Christ. I'll gladly pay to see it, no matter what the critics say. A visionary deserves his reward.
To: LibKill
It won't reach 1 billion Hindus without subtitles though. Not to be trite, but 1 billion Hindus are probably not the target market.
As long as the film recoups the 100+ million dollars it cost to make it, it will be considered a success. Considering how well family-oriented films do at the box office (Shrek, Toy Story, etc.) there is a huge appetite for family-friendly entertainment. Whether the crucifixion will be considered family-friendly or not is yet to be seen, but if the intention is to portray the last twelve hourse of the life of Christ as realistically as possible, it may well appeal to the family audience.
To: ex-Texan
Good for Mel. He's one of my all time favorites.(BraveHeart) But I think that the "Bean Counters" might have a say in how this motion picture will be released.
The Ol'Bottom Line is seldom a friend of the Arts.
15
posted on
09/21/2002 1:08:21 PM PDT
by
Pompah
To: E. Pluribus Unum
You have a bunch of good points there.
16
posted on
09/21/2002 1:10:43 PM PDT
by
LibKill
To: cyncooper
"Tempus fugit" is all I remember from 3 years of high school Latin, but I remember the Latin Mass quite well.
Latin, Aramaic, or Greek, I'll be interested in seeing it.
As long as it's not in French!
To: ex-Texan
Very interesting. Thanks for posting it.
18
posted on
09/21/2002 1:12:41 PM PDT
by
syriacus
To: meowmeow
Pilate, the Roman administrators, the Roman army would speak Latin to one another. I think the normal belief is that the spoken language of the Jews at the time was Aramaic.
But I'd be very surprised if Greek was not the language used to communicate between Jews and Romans.
To: ex-Texan
Should be cheap to shoot...all scenes being local, technology simple then. He's a rich and powerful guy...and wants to make a document for a change, perhaps. It's his hobby, his quarter. If there isn't Greek in it...I think it'll be another movie fraud. I don't know if he's on a self-indulgent jaunt...or really doing what director Emir Kusturica does...which is only work in the original languages. Subtitles there, though. Then again....lots of us have the original script around! Some of us even read it.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-34 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson