[thedugal]

Please correct me if I am wrong here, but didn't Bush mention something about those who fund terrorists being terrorists? Not sure if I got that right, but it sure does ring a bell...

[Lion's Cub]

didn't Bush mention something about those who fund terrorists being terrorists?

I doubt that it had anything to do with this story, but

Saudi Arabia 'shocked' to be added to watchlist
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/754574/posts

[Godfollow]

Haven't you heard?... Saudi has been placed on list of suspect countries. Anyone trying to enter the US from suspect countries must go through much more riggorous examination and will be shadowed if allowed in.

Saudi is not too happy bout that. I think this administration is beginning to seriously understand the depth of hatred for our country and culture... I hope.

[SBeck]

Please correct me if I am wrong here, but didn't Bush mention something about those who fund terrorists being terrorists? Not sure if I got that right, but it sure does ring a bell...

You must not have been listening during the last part:

"....provided they don't breed over a valuable resource."

[Darksheare]

He also invoked NATO. "An attack on one is an attack on all."

This also, then, includes NATO policy on Weapons of Mass Destruction. (WoMD being ANY biological, chemical, or nuclear weapon designed to kill, injure or render ineffective mass numbers of civilians or soldeirs. The Anthrax scare counts as such..)

Nato's Standard Operating Procedure is to answer chem/biological attacks with a nuke. (At least on paper, for now.) Wonder how many nations out there that backed up the terrorists are wondering when they'll see the bright flash at the end of the tunnel.

'Course, I'm not saying we should nuke them. But since that is NATO SOP,and we inc\voked NATO, we should at least make a showing of looking like we'll do it. Put the fear of GOD in the soul-less SOB's and send the camel cres running for the nearest oasis.. as far away as they can get.