Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chance33_98; Wolfie; headsonpikes; WyldKard; WindMinstrel; FreeTally; tacticalogic; Xenalyte; ...
...arguing that the marijuana had been prescribed by a physician as a means of relieving chronic back pain.

Under California law, a physician can prescribe cannabis, correct? Should an employer be allowed to discriminate against employees because they are taking prescription medication that the employer does not approve of? "Hey boy, I done told you once you ain't gonna be doin that insulin crap on my watch."

5 posted on 09/20/2002 6:07:31 PM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Dakmar
Dang-this could really open up a can of worms.

In a perfect world,of course,freedom of association would be a respected tradition as well as being upheld by law. In a perfect world,people wouldn't be pointing guns at other people over recreational chemicals,or prescription medicines.

Not sure,but I think that Cal. Docs can recommend MJ,as opposed to prescribing it. If that's the case,a lot would hinge on the definition of "recommend." Also,was this gentleman informed prior to employment that he would be subject to testing?

6 posted on 09/20/2002 6:20:05 PM PDT by sawsalimb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dakmar
Having suffered a bad injury to my back I can understand the pain. I was on hydrocodene (sp?) and the like for about a year. I was out of work due to the injury but had I been working and they fired me over it I gurantee I would have sued (although, in a no fault state like Ohio doubtful I would win). I can see reassigning duties, could not have driven a forklift or flown a plane, but firing seems out of line.

But then some might argue his company could fire him anyway for anything on anyday, so I am not sure it matters ;)

8 posted on 09/20/2002 6:22:55 PM PDT by chance33_98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: Dakmar
Should an employer be allowed to discriminate against employees because they are taking prescription medication

The only thing that makes sense to me is the potential increase of liability coming from the risk of taking a medication in the workplace which can be defined as 'mind altering'.

Had a hysterectomy almost two years ago, and due to extreme pain, I was on narcotiocs for 12 months before the actual surgery and had to be extremely careful when and where I took the meds on work days.

Just a thought-
10 posted on 09/20/2002 6:28:10 PM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson