Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New Mexico Supreme Court Strikes Down Concealed Weapons Law
Handgun Control / Brady Campaign ^ | 6/5/2002 | Editorial Staff

Posted on 09/20/2002 9:32:38 AM PDT by vannrox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last
To: mvpel
If I recall, New Mexico already has open carry.
That said, the way the CCW law was written, it gave the cities the ability to ban CCW holders within their borders which made getting a license a waste of time and dangerous if a CCW holder would wander across a certain street without realizing the laws or in what locality they were in.
If they were smart, which they aren't, the legislators would have copied Florida's law. It works and it opens the door to reciprosity.
There has always been an excuse for gunowners to ignore the dems in their state governments. The residents of Ohio, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska and Illinois are finding out how important it is to get rid of them.
21 posted on 09/20/2002 10:00:37 AM PDT by Shooter 2.5
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
Is that a Ruger or a Taurus?
22 posted on 09/20/2002 10:01:12 AM PDT by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Can anyone tell me why we "need" permits in the first place? Isn't the 2nd Amendment permit enough.
23 posted on 09/20/2002 10:11:48 AM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chookter
I wonder if the morons who released the story understand this?
24 posted on 09/20/2002 10:13:59 AM PDT by ItisaReligionofPeace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ItisaReligionofPeace
Because they'll throw us in jail if we don't have them, and/or force us to spend tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars defending ourselves from their legal assault.
25 posted on 09/20/2002 10:14:06 AM PDT by mvpel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: chookter
Thanks for the explanation - it helps to have a local expose the spin!
26 posted on 09/20/2002 10:16:42 AM PDT by BlueNgold
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
Looks like a Ruger SP-100.
27 posted on 09/20/2002 10:18:38 AM PDT by DrNo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: chookter
Baca v. New Mexico Department of Public Safety

You are absolutely correct. The gun grabbers have put an incredible spin on this opinion. Anyone who reads it can see that.

I encourage all reading this thread to read the actual opinion (it's not long) to see the court's rationale. The Act was struck down ENTIRELY because it allowed local governments (as opposed to the state) to regulate the issuance of concealed weapons permits, in violation of the state constitution which says, "no municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms."

In other words, if the law had a preemption clause (as many state CCW laws do), the court would not have struck down the provision for this reason. The important thing to note is, the court DID NOT decide whether Art. II Section 6 of the NM Constitution prohibits the carrying of concealed weapons. That is still an open question.

Bottom line is, the Brady Center For Spreading Lies and Misinformation has simply spun and spun and spun to conform these types of opinions in their favor.

28 posted on 09/20/2002 10:30:30 AM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Actually, the NMSSC did gun-owners here a favor. By striking down what stated as a pretty good bill, turned into a lame excuse byt eh Dumocraps, it gives us a chance to write the bill it should have been

There was no provision for reciprocity.
There was too high a fee. ($100)
There was annual renewal.($100)
There was no provision for calibers under .32
You had to qualify with each caliber you intended to carry.
You had to qualify for both revolver and auto if you decided to carry either one.

The bill working now covers all of these items.

Reciprocity with states surrounding NM.
$100 fee for a 5-year license.
$35 renewal.
Under qualifying, if you can qualify with the .45 Automatic, you will be allowed to carry either revolver or auto in any caliber.

Bill Richardson said he would sign a CCW bill if it got to his desk. John Sanchez says the same.

I hope to get that answer from Richardson on tape at our gun show in October.

29 posted on 09/20/2002 10:37:19 AM PDT by Pistolshot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Psalm 73
Ruger SP 101.
Double Action Only!

A wrist snapping flame thrower! =^)

30 posted on 09/20/2002 10:40:56 AM PDT by rockfish59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: rockfish59
"Ruger SP 101."

I thought that looked familiar - that's what I carry, (you've got good taste).
All the comfort of "point and click"...

31 posted on 09/20/2002 10:52:28 AM PDT by Psalm 73
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Police are forced to issue CCW permits.

As opposed to the gun-grabbers' wish, "Police are forced to deny CCW permits".

32 posted on 09/20/2002 10:55:27 AM PDT by Dan Day
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chookter
When you post something like your correction: use really really BIG type!

[Thanks]
33 posted on 09/20/2002 10:56:12 AM PDT by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GnL
Is Jim Baca the plaintiff related to Joe Baca, a Justice hearing the case?
34 posted on 09/20/2002 11:06:02 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Pistolshot
Wow, pretty lousy provisions you posted there. I like Florida's system for the most part. You get your permit, you can carry anything you want without qualifying on it, and it only needs to be renewed every five years. What's more, the laws governing CCW are even a bit less restrictive than those of Texas.
35 posted on 09/20/2002 11:09:09 AM PDT by RogueIsland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Teacher317
Who knows?

It's well within the realm of possibility. However, there are 3 pages of Baca's in the Albuquerque phone book alone.

36 posted on 09/20/2002 11:24:39 AM PDT by Cogadh na Sith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Dan Day
Police are forced to issue CCW permits.

This phrase appears 13 times out of 20(?) in their state by state summary.

Doesn't look like they're doing too well :)

37 posted on 09/20/2002 11:31:37 AM PDT by rllngrk33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: *bang_list

Click on the pistol to display the latest FreeRepublic 'bang_list' posts.


38 posted on 09/20/2002 11:31:43 AM PDT by Joe Brower
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox

39 posted on 09/20/2002 11:43:41 AM PDT by Search4Truth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Bird
you can't carry them into places of nuisance in Florida, either, and that means bars. Also Federal Reserve Banks, and some other select establishments!
40 posted on 09/20/2002 11:47:26 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-63 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson