Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: chookter
Baca v. New Mexico Department of Public Safety

You are absolutely correct. The gun grabbers have put an incredible spin on this opinion. Anyone who reads it can see that.

I encourage all reading this thread to read the actual opinion (it's not long) to see the court's rationale. The Act was struck down ENTIRELY because it allowed local governments (as opposed to the state) to regulate the issuance of concealed weapons permits, in violation of the state constitution which says, "no municipality or county shall regulate, in any way, an incident of the right to keep and bear arms."

In other words, if the law had a preemption clause (as many state CCW laws do), the court would not have struck down the provision for this reason. The important thing to note is, the court DID NOT decide whether Art. II Section 6 of the NM Constitution prohibits the carrying of concealed weapons. That is still an open question.

Bottom line is, the Brady Center For Spreading Lies and Misinformation has simply spun and spun and spun to conform these types of opinions in their favor.

28 posted on 09/20/2002 10:30:30 AM PDT by GnL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: GnL
Is Jim Baca the plaintiff related to Joe Baca, a Justice hearing the case?
34 posted on 09/20/2002 11:06:02 AM PDT by Teacher317
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson