Replies

Are you prepared to tell me that if the SC rules that people with names that end with an "N" can own firearms (and no one else), it would be illegal?

Would you petition to thbe UN for a new look? LOL!

NO ... at that point we petition to God in Heaven using the very logic and intent and methods proscribed by the founders in the Delcaration and by the same means wherein they set the example.

I pray to God it does not come to that, but at that point we will have been forced into the same recourse they took when the government of their day came to take their arms ... which they rightly recognized were their last resort to obtain, keep, vouchsafe and preserve the very rights they later enumerated in the BOR.

Like I say, I pray and work with all energy to avoid it coming to that. I hope it does not.

Viva Le Dissention: States have a right to prevent people from bearing arms. Period. 62
Senator Pardek: Unfortunately you are correct, and what you are saying is going over everyone's head. 256
Zon: States don't have rights. It's important to get the basics correct first .264
Senator Pardek: Cut the crap - you're mistaking me for the other ignorant hillbillies around here. 273
Zon: No crap. Just a fact. States don't have rights. That's basic, IMO. Do you agree? 275

Are you prepared to tell me that if the SC rules that people with names that end with an "N" can own firearms (and no one else), it would be illegal?
Would you petition to thbe UN for a new look? LOL!

What's up with he straw man -- I asked you a simple question. "States don't have rights. That's basic, IMO. Do you agree?" 275