To: Stultis
Well, if they needed an expert opinion on religious BIGOTRY, they sure went to a reputable source in Pat Robertson.
49 posted on
09/19/2002 8:01:52 PM PDT by
Illbay
To: Illbay
I thought Robertson was pretty much right on the mark. I'm not a fan of his at all, but it takes a lot of bravery to show just how nasty the koran is, and to tell people it's right there, to read.
That part of what he was was 100%.
52 posted on
09/19/2002 8:05:30 PM PDT by
Monty22
To: Illbay
Too cute.
79 posted on
09/19/2002 8:53:06 PM PDT by
HIDEK6
To: Illbay
Well, if they needed an expert opinion on religious BIGOTRY, they sure went to a reputable source in Pat Robertson.Can't disagree with that. But the point is that, in America, criticism of religion, any religion, is protected speech (as is religious advocacy). I might also add that such speech is part of a larger context of critical rationalism which has made both Christianity and Judaism reformist religions, and which has tended moderate and civilize the more extreme elements of these religions.
The wahhabi lobby needs to come to terms with the implications of religious freedom in America. To the extent they attempt to shield Islam from its critics (external and internal, btw) they are at odds with a fundamental American/Western/liberal value.
98 posted on
09/19/2002 9:40:28 PM PDT by
Stultis
To: Illbay
Could you point out where Robertson was wrong?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson