Posted on 09/18/2002 3:46:29 AM PDT by kattracks
eh,,,,we were kidding????
is there such a thing?
by the way you saved yourself from a humilating monty-python flaming! :) good morning friend!
hey i thank canada everyday for hockey punks such as darren McCarty and Tie Domi :)
"Does England have any influence over these canucks at all?"
I'm not even going to dignify a lot of the posters' comments here with a response (the usual Canada haters are out in force) but your questions seem legit.
HRH Queen Elizabeth II is the Queen of Canada and official head of state. Her representative in Canada is the Governor General, who is appointed by the Prime Minister. Other than mostly ceremonial duties, the Governor General's main function is to serve as referee in the event of a non-confidence vote in parliament. The GG must decide if another member of the ruling party can garner enough support to carry the government or if an election must be called. For practical purposes, the Queen has no involvement whatsoever in Canadian political life. At most, she might address parliament once a decade or so during a royal visit to Canada.
With the exception of both being members of NATO, I'm not aware of any ties or agreements between Britian and Canada. NATO members frequently use Canadian bases for training exercises. The British sold Canada some second hand subs, but they leak.
Canada has a huge area, and three oceans worth of coastline. The tax burden of protecting all of that with a population of 30 million or so is huge, so whatever level of funding the military got it was never enough. Add the Liberals, who have been cutting the military ever since they were elected, and you have the makings of a dangerous situation. They haven't learned the lessons of history, or so it seems.
It's a VERY long dead end street called "Natural Resource Way."
Now play nice or we won't share.
Name one time any Canadian outfit has surrendered. EVER.
I don't have a problem with the maple syrup soaked remark, but the rest was way not cool.
1) all gun owners will need to have a license to own or obtain a gun by 2001The noose is tightening. A few years ago, the socialists pushed through registration of all short-barrelled handguns -- after promising that no confiscation would follow. Of course, that promise was quickly broken. It's a gun rights nightmare up North and getting worse everyday. Kind of like California, where I live. :-(2) safety checks will be made on an applicant before a license is issued
3) spouses and partners of applicants will be notified when a new applicant wishes to acquire a gun
4) new applicants will have to pass a safety course all firearms must be registered by 2003.
5) To register a firearm, applicants must have a license.
6) eventually firearms brought into Canada will be recorded at the point of entry
7) all firearms must be stored unloaded and made inoperable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.