Replies

Kim, your belief in DW's guilt is based on hours and hours of research, discussion, debate. You have kept an open mind on the subject. I don't know why you think you are on the 'other side'.
I am talking about the process. I think we all should be questioning it. Those that don't question the process because it gave the answer they wanted all along, are the ones that , to me , are on the other side.

I am talking about the process.....

I think we all received a good education on the process and most on the threads were trying to search for the truth.

That being said I find this article difficult to swallow.

Why would the defense be about to plea bargain guilty and tell where the body is to avoid the death penalty when it would seem Westerfield would have a better chance in trial if the body was never found. (It is possible the body may never have been found)

But once the body is found the defense believe they can win the case and decide to go to trial. The prosecutor had all the same evidence with or without a body.(except bugs)

Makes no sense to me.

"Kim, your belief in DW's guilt is based on hours and hours of research, discussion, debate. You have kept an open mind on the subject. I don't know why you think you are on the 'other side'. I am talking about the process. I think we all should be questioning it. Those that don't question the process because it gave the answer they wanted all along, are the ones that , to me , are on the other side. "

I see no reason to classify some of the freepers who think he's guilty into categories. I think we had enough of that from the loud group who no longer lives to disrupt those of us who really want to discuss/debate. I don't mean to offend you or people who agree with you..I'm just sick and tired of all the labels.

As far as the legal process goes, of course it deserves scrutiny. I still think that there has to be a legal watchdog group out there that can help you guys.