Replies

That was me, Ditter. The offer still holds.

I'm sorry you can't see what's being spoonfed to you imo. But we each make our own decisions.

I still think he's innocent, still can't build a coherent scenario around the notion of guilt.

Flame away, I don't bite back. Just share my thinking where I think someone might be interested. That's why I don't say much here anymore, don't think y'all are interested in hearing thinking like mine.

Don't worry, I don't flame & when someone flames, me I ignore them from then on, even on other threads.

I don't know why you think I have been spoon fed. I don't watch Nancy Grace, I still dislike her for her defense of clinton during impeachment.

I get all my info right here on FR. I have listened to both sides, read the transcripts & made up my mind very late in the trial. I am not a VD defender, I think their lifestyle could very well have allowed this awful thing to happen to Danielle.

I can't get past the blood/dna evidence, the print in the MH, Danielle's hair. How you can just explain away (or ignore) those things is beyond me.

DW does not look innocent, sweet & kind, he looks evil & sinister. He had trouble with relationships with women, drank too much & looked at child porn. You are ignoring all those things & focusing on......... I don't know what. OH, I know, you think he was framed. What do you think about the new story that he was ready to tell them where her body was? Lies...... all lies..... right? What will you say if it is true?