Replies

Don't worry, I don't flame & when someone flames, me I ignore them from then on, even on other threads.

I don't know why you think I have been spoon fed. I don't watch Nancy Grace, I still dislike her for her defense of clinton during impeachment.

I get all my info right here on FR. I have listened to both sides, read the transcripts & made up my mind very late in the trial. I am not a VD defender, I think their lifestyle could very well have allowed this awful thing to happen to Danielle.

I can't get past the blood/dna evidence, the print in the MH, Danielle's hair. How you can just explain away (or ignore) those things is beyond me.

DW does not look innocent, sweet & kind, he looks evil & sinister. He had trouble with relationships with women, drank too much & looked at child porn. You are ignoring all those things & focusing on......... I don't know what. OH, I know, you think he was framed. What do you think about the new story that he was ready to tell them where her body was? Lies...... all lies..... right? What will you say if it is true?

You think I'm ignoring important info, I think you are not looking critically at things that don't add up to me. I guess we can agree to disagree.

I think, re-reading the article, that this story is constructed to look like DW was offering a plea bargain. But at the time, there was info that the DA was offering the plea bargain. Put on your Clinton parsing ring, and this article says that, too.

I think the DA is putting this out to try and smoke out Feldman's appeal tactics, so he can be prepared to counter them.

It doesn't matter what you or I think on this, DW is going to sit in jail for a long time, probably forever. Danielle died a terrible death. And we're really just playing a parlor game here, try to understand points of view.

Thank you for your response.