Skip to comments.
Plea deal 'minutes away' when body found
San Diego Union Tribune ^
| September 17, 2002
| J. Harry Jones
Posted on 09/17/2002 5:28:16 AM PDT by Bug
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 641-655 next last
To: Cultural Jihad
There were drugs and promiscuous sex and child porn involved in this case.I'm biting my tongue.
I don't want to give the burgeoning "Boot Statists Curry et al from FR" shadow movement any added impetus to coalesce at this time.
To: redlipstick
Because Feldman has known all along that he was defending a killer.I've often wondered if a lawyer would defend a person if he really knew the person was guilty and how the lawyer would act when doing so.
If this is true then we learned how a lawyer would act.
Disconnected and all over the place.
82
posted on
09/17/2002 7:52:30 AM PDT
by
Spunky
To: Spunky
Yes, somewhat disconnected in his closing, but sharp as a razor the rest of the time. It's got to be harder to make a coherent closing when you know your client is guilty as sin.
83
posted on
09/17/2002 7:55:53 AM PDT
by
Amore
To: Hildy
I didn't think you'd want to miss this one.
84
posted on
09/17/2002 7:56:05 AM PDT
by
xJones
To: VRWC_minion
Because its sourced in a paper that could be held accountable rather than an anon person in internet. You're making a joke right? When do the media claim responsibility for anything?
How can you hold an anonymous source accountable? Why would a responsible newspaper print a story such as this without a comment from the defense lawyers?
Maybe to sway public opinion, nah! Everybody already knows he's guilty, Bill O'Reilly told me so.
To: redlipstick
I believe this article, because it tells us exactly why Feldman never claimed that his client, your big ole teddybear Dave, is an innocent man. Even Feldman's statement yesterday - did you miss it? - was about international disapproval of the death penalty, and not about wrongful conviction It will be interesting to see if Feldman comes out and denies this article. I suspect he won't.
And I predict that the majority of the Squeakies will NEVER under any circumstance believe he did this crime. They have so much invested emotionally that they can't.
To: Cultural Jihad
This however was the only reason that anyone was able to give me--outside of the usual "the police are corrupt" rant--as to their support.
87
posted on
09/17/2002 7:57:55 AM PDT
by
Illbay
To: CW_Conservative
"Law enforcement sources told The San Diego Union-Tribune yesterday defense lawyers Steven Feldman and Robert Boyce were negotiating for a life sentence for the 50-year-old design engineer, a neighbor of the van Dams in Sabre Springs."
The newspaper must be part of the CONSPIRACY!!!!
88
posted on
09/17/2002 8:01:10 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Roscoe
The newspaper must be part of the CONSPIRACY!!!! Neither Feldman nor Boyce could be reached for comment last night.
Do you think this article could have waited until Feldman or Boyce could have commented? Why the anonymous source? The gag order has been lifted.
Obviously law enforcement and the newspaper were both involved in publishing this story, which is unfair to David Westerfield in that he is unable to respond. So yes you can call it a conspiracy if you wish.
To: Amore
Which one of the apologist was willing to invite Westerfield over to her house for dinner & invite her grandchildren? Wonder what she would serve........ crow?
90
posted on
09/17/2002 8:09:47 AM PDT
by
Ditter
To: CW_Conservative
All Westerfield's attorney has to do is call a press conference and say, "Regardless of the speculation and lies that may be found in the papers, my client is innocent of these charges. The report that he was about to take a plea in exchange for information about the location of the body is totally false. He could not have offered to make such a plea because he did not know where the body was."
To: Ditter
You know, you don't have to be so mean. That person obviously thinks differently now. Have you ever made a mistake.
Talk about rubbing it in.
Geeez guys, take it easy. Do you wonder why they're not here?
92
posted on
09/17/2002 8:15:59 AM PDT
by
It's me
To: It's me
No, I don't wonder why they're not here. It's not easy to admit you're wrong, and I commend you for it. I wonder how many more will step up to the plate and do so after all the abuse they heaped upon us?
93
posted on
09/17/2002 8:19:35 AM PDT
by
Amore
To: CW_Conservative
Why the anonymous source? Sources. Law enforcement sources.
The newpaper must be lying as part of the government cover-up! This conspiracy is even worse than the one against poor innocent OJ!!
94
posted on
09/17/2002 8:19:51 AM PDT
by
Roscoe
To: Kevin Curry
All Westerfield's attorney has to do is call a press conference and say, "Regardless of the speculation and lies that may be found in the papers, my client is innocent of these charges. The report that he was about to take a plea in exchange for information about the location of the body is totally false. He could not have offered to make such a plea because he did not know where the body was." Why should he have to deny something that was said by someone who is unwilling to identify theirself?
To: CW_Conservative
"could not be reached for comment" is just standard reporter language. More often than not doesn't really mean "could not be reached" exactly. It means "we tried to talk to them and we left messages, but they would not return our calls." I'll bet dollars to donuts Feldy was well aware they wanted a comment from him on the plea, but he has no good response, so he chose not to respond.
96
posted on
09/17/2002 8:23:44 AM PDT
by
Amore
To: It's me; Ditter
Actually, I don't know WHO the person was who was willing to have DW over for dinner. But, unless it was you, how do you know they have changed their mind? The ones who have posted here (other than you) seem unwilling to concede anything.
97
posted on
09/17/2002 8:26:00 AM PDT
by
Amore
To: Roscoe
Sources. Law enforcement sources.Thanks.
The newpaper must be lying as part of the government cover-up! This conspiracy is even worse than the one against poor innocent OJ!!
The government has no need to cover-up when everyboby is unwilling to even ask questions. Why have a trial, what is the point?
To: Amore
Yes, somewhat disconnected in his closing, but sharp as a razor the rest of the time. It's got to be harder to make a coherent closing when you know your client is guilty as sin.
I'm convinced that someone as sharp as Feldman was purposeful in his closing argument. It was a strategy to confuse at least one juror.
99
posted on
09/17/2002 8:33:34 AM PDT
by
Bug
To: Cultural Jihad
~~~There are occasional cases in the news which surface wherein they'll scramble to pin the blame upon society, or law enforcement. As such they are no different from whiney liberals with their whiney cop-outs. ~~~
Bingo.......and well said!
100
posted on
09/17/2002 8:33:57 AM PDT
by
justshe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 641-655 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson