To: Roscoe
The newspaper must be part of the CONSPIRACY!!!! Neither Feldman nor Boyce could be reached for comment last night.
Do you think this article could have waited until Feldman or Boyce could have commented? Why the anonymous source? The gag order has been lifted.
Obviously law enforcement and the newspaper were both involved in publishing this story, which is unfair to David Westerfield in that he is unable to respond. So yes you can call it a conspiracy if you wish.
To: CW_Conservative
All Westerfield's attorney has to do is call a press conference and say, "Regardless of the speculation and lies that may be found in the papers, my client is innocent of these charges. The report that he was about to take a plea in exchange for information about the location of the body is totally false. He could not have offered to make such a plea because he did not know where the body was."
To: CW_Conservative
Why the anonymous source? Sources. Law enforcement sources.
The newpaper must be lying as part of the government cover-up! This conspiracy is even worse than the one against poor innocent OJ!!
94 posted on
09/17/2002 8:19:51 AM PDT by
Roscoe
To: CW_Conservative
"could not be reached for comment" is just standard reporter language. More often than not doesn't really mean "could not be reached" exactly. It means "we tried to talk to them and we left messages, but they would not return our calls." I'll bet dollars to donuts Feldy was well aware they wanted a comment from him on the plea, but he has no good response, so he chose not to respond.
96 posted on
09/17/2002 8:23:44 AM PDT by
Amore
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson