Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Russia says Iraq decision is satisfactory and new UN Security Council resolution is unnecessary
AFP via Babelfish translation ^ | September 17, 2002

Posted on 09/17/2002 12:39:07 AM PDT by HAL9000

Iraq: Satisfied Moscow and new resolution of UNO not necessary (Ivanov)

Tuesday September 17, 2002 - 7h28 GMT

MOSCOW, 17 seven (AFP) - the Russian Minister for the Foreign Affairs Igor Ivanov was delighted by the Iraqi decision to contrary accept a return without condition of the inspectors in disarmament of UNO by estimating that a new resolution of UNO was not necessary, at Washington.

"It is necessary to regulate in the days to come the question from the return of the inspectors. One should not for that of new decisions. The return of the inspectors is a key objective to reassure the international community ", underlined Mr. Ivanov quoted by the Itar-Tass agency from New York.

A high person in charge for the State Department declared Monday that the United States intended "to go from before with a resolution which will show that Iraq is in contradiction with its obligations and who will show the way to be followed on what Iraq must do and what will arrive if Iraq does not follow this direction".

"Thanks to our united efforts, we managed to avoid the threat of a war and return to average policies to regulate the Iraqi problem", still estimated Mr. Ivanov quoted by Interfax commenting on for Russian journalists the letter given to the secretary-general of UNO, Kofi Annan, where Baghdad announces its decision of an agreement on the return of the inspectors of UNO.

"the main thing is that (inspectors) resume their work", it added.

Russia, one of the five permanent members of the Security Council of UNO and old ally of Iraq, required on several occasions in Baghdad to authorize the return of the inspectors in disarmament of the United Nations, whose mission had been stopped in 1998.

Moscow is firmly opposed to the idea of a military intervention of the United States, in Iraq.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; ivanov; russia; saddamhussein; unitednations

1 posted on 09/17/2002 12:39:07 AM PDT by HAL9000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
I'm hoping this is part of Bush's plan.
2 posted on 09/17/2002 12:57:09 AM PDT by aynrandfreak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Uhhhhh...is this for real? Sounds like
dialogue from a really bad foreign
movie. As to the substance, that the
Russkies are saying this to Bush...get
out! Really? Putin has misunderstood
this President...FATALLY...if true!!!
3 posted on 09/17/2002 1:02:54 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
"Thanks to our united efforts, we managed to ... return to average policies to regulate the Iraqi problem"

I know it's just a lousy translation, but it says it all.

4 posted on 09/17/2002 1:03:13 AM PDT by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
Babelfish has ZERO credibility here.

The last sentence of this article:

"Moscow is firmly opposed to the idea of a military intervention of the United States, in Iraq."

Rather telling re: THEIR inside information, no? Putin already announced that Russia was on board.

5 posted on 09/17/2002 1:03:57 AM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justshe
When? What did Putin say?
6 posted on 09/17/2002 1:07:06 AM PDT by txrangerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
The Russkies are as stupid as they look. Apparently, they never read the Iraqi Foreign Minister's letter. The conditions in it give lie to the media generated perception Saddam's surrendered. He must be having a good belly laugh over having pulled a fast one over the snookered Russians and Eurotrash.
7 posted on 09/17/2002 1:32:02 AM PDT by goldstategop
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: aynrandfreak
I just can't imagine that they have all the chess moves mapped out with Deep Blue on this one... I have NEVER beaten my 7 year old niece at chess. Not because I'm dumb or can't foresee possible moves, but because she either doesn't play by the rules...or she quits before she loses!!!!
9 posted on 09/17/2002 5:50:54 AM PDT by sam_paine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: aynrandfreak
I'm hoping this is part of Bush's plan.

No, I think to some extent the "strategery" team is winging it. (But they "wing it" damn good.) I don't think Bush really wanted to go to the U.N., except for rubber stamp approval after an alliance for "regime change" had been formed. Instead, due to resistance to the notion of regime change, they had to go to the U.N. to advance the issue. Bush met 'em halfway with the not-quite-explicitly-stated implication that Saddam could forestall regime change by strict compliance with U.N. resolutions.

Now Saddam is going to pretend that he is willing to follow the compliance path, and some of our allies are going to pretend that they believe him. The strategery team, although certainly hoping for intransigence from Saddam, can't have failed to anticipate this, but I'm not sure they have a preplanned response. The immediate need is clear enough: to stop short any international rush to declare the crisis solved. We'll just have to see where they go from here. I'd guess they are furiously negotiating to get a very strict new resolution from the security council obligating Saddam to requirements beyond mere WMD inspectors. What this article suggests is that Russia no longer views further U.N. resolutions as necessary. This is a problem that needs to be dealt with quickly.

10 posted on 09/17/2002 5:55:19 AM PDT by Stultis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HAL9000
the Russian Minister for the Foreign Affairs Igor Ivanov was delighted by the Iraqi decision to contrary accept a return without condition

Wrong! It was just announced that there are (of course) conditions. Iraq has stated that the inspections team can only have access to military zones. Sounds like a condition to me.

11 posted on 09/17/2002 6:46:17 AM PDT by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mixer; Senator_Palpatine
I don't think that Bush will accept that.

"Saddam Hussein is a clumsy as he is stupid. General Franks, prepare for ground assault."
12 posted on 09/17/2002 6:55:58 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I don't think that Bush will accept that. I don't think that Bush will accept that.

President Bush has already stated that there are no conditions. He wants the removal of all WMDs from Iraq and ultimately the remaval of the current regime. I don't think he has ever strayed from this.

13 posted on 09/17/2002 7:07:54 AM PDT by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Mixer; Poohbah; Miss Marple
I don't think so either.

Looks like we'll have to do this the old-fashioned way.

By ourselves. Guess we get to keep the oil for ourselves, too.
14 posted on 09/17/2002 7:24:39 AM PDT by hchutch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Stultis
Your# 10)................Bingo!.................BTTT
15 posted on 09/17/2002 8:11:19 AM PDT by maestro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Mixer
Where was this announced? That would make all the difference. I don't believe it, not yet at least. Still too much time needed to collapse the forming coalition. Where's the link. We need it NOW.
16 posted on 09/17/2002 8:26:49 AM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: epluribus_2
http://freerepublic.com/focus/news/752189/posts
17 posted on 09/17/2002 10:51:47 AM PDT by Mixer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson