[KingKongCobra]

Hmm. I'm afraid that the Constitution means whatever 9 old men think it means. I often disagree with them but if they decide that it's OK to take these guns, then it's OK. That's the breaks.

[Ken H]

Hmm. I'm afraid the Constitution means whatever 9 old men think it means.

That is true. Still, citizens should have an informed opinion about USSC ruling and whether or not they are being true to the written Constitution.

I often disagree with them but if they decide it's OK to take these guns, then it's OK. That's the breaks.

Does asset forfeiture such as this violate any aspect of the Constitution, according to how you read and understand the Constitution?

[jjm2111]

Would you follow that logic to extreme circumstances?

Like: I'm afraid that the Constitution means whatever 9 old men think it means. I often disagree with them but if they decide that it's OK to take everyone's guns, then it's OK. That's the breaks.

Or: I'm afraid that the Constitution means whatever the man with the funny mustache says it means. I often disagree with him but if they decide that it's OK to kill all the Jews, then it's OK. That's the breaks.

Asset forfeiture laws are un-Constitutional. The should be repealed.