Posted on 09/16/2002 7:15:16 PM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29
Nearly one in three children aged between four and eight cannot tell the time on traditional clock faces.
A study has found that the prevalence of digital clocks on computers, video timers, radio alarms and mobile phones means that children learn to tell the time this way - such as "10:45" rather than "a quarter to eleven".
The survey of 2,950 parents found that the number of children who recognised the "big hand, little hand" method had decreased from 75 per cent to 66 per cent in a year.
Government guidelines state that all children in reception classes - those aged four to five - should be able to read traditional clocks. But 59 per cent cannot.
By year one, aged five to six, they are supposed to understand half and quarter hours, but 52 per cent cannot.
A year later they are meant to have a sense of hours, minutes and seconds, but more than one in four are still struggling. Nearly two thirds of this group cannot tell the time on a digital clock.
Nick Seaton, chairman of the Campaign for Real Education, said: "Children are continually being confronted by digital displays and so it is essential that they also learn to tell the time on analogue clocks and watches."
The research was carried out by BMRB International for the watch-makers Flik Flak.
There are some things that just change over time and people have to get over it!! The fact is that most clocks that one sees these days are digital. Would you complain if a study came out that stated that most kids cannot use a rotary dial phone anymore?
I agree that we need to teach kids to read an analog clock but it just is not as important anymore.
I learned the metric system in kindegarten (in an overseas school of course) and I bet that many complaining about the inability of our kids to read analog clock could not tell a decimeter from a minute hand.
The metric system is a much more valuable skill to learn than telling time on an analog clock IMHO.
Too bad they are not replacing the teaching of analog clock reading with more in depth study of something useful instead of teaching why johnny has 2 mothers.
THIS is what clocks and watches should look like. Pure analog. Teaches the valuable skill of estimating.
Analog will continue to be the standard amoung higher end watches and clocks for decades.
Imagine a guy dressed to the teeth. Quality wool suit, silk tie, starched white shirt, and a gold plated DIGITAL watch? Somehow it just doesn't fit in.
Same with nicer desk or wall clocks (the ones that run from $100 to $1000 or more.) Somehow a $1000 digital clock just doesn't cut it.
There's a certain class and elegance about analog clocks that just can not be attained by digital clocks.
Hey, polyester is cheaper and lasts longer than wool, but when was the last time you saw someone wearing a polyester suit?
I haven't owned a digital watch in many years as well.
Thanks for the reply. Maybe you could tell me one other thing. What are digits used to show the number "9" on the dial of that clock? Are they showing "IX" or "VIIII"?
Regards, Boot Hill
When he was in first grade the teacher sent home a note that we should help our child with telling time. As soon as we got the note we realized that we had no traditional clocks in the house at all. Within a few weeks after getting one he was able to tell time just fine.
This is no crisis, this is progress. How many of us could set up a sun dial or water clock ?
No doubt about that. I don't care how high tech something might be (like atomic clock driven digitals that are accurate within thousandth of a second or so), it just doesn't have the quality of precision machinery. It doesn't have 'soul' to it.
My 10 year old bought an old watch at a garage sale for a dollar recently. She saw it and just pounced on it, she was that captivated by it. It was just an old Elgin that you had to wind up with the stem, but it had real class. An inscription on the back indicated it was a given as a gift back in 1947. 55 years down the line and it still kept perfect time and, short of a few scratches on the crystal, looked great. Talk about worksmanship (and the worksmen, of course). Just holding it in your hand ... you could just sort of feel the history and workmanship of a few centuries of accumulated watchmaking skills.
Somehow, I doubt that a kid 55 years from now will find an old digital at a garage sale and even notice it, much less fall in love with it.
But ... how can you tell if it's AM or PM?
At 14, I left most of that behind to pursue girls...
Oh great. Now I have to consider the ramifications of having a girl child. Thanks. *grin*
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.