Skip to comments.
Speed of light broken with basic lab kit
New Scientist.com ^
 | 16 September 02
 | Charles Choi
Posted on 09/16/2002 7:26:53 AM PDT by aculeus
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next  last
    
1
posted on 
09/16/2002 7:26:53 AM PDT
by 
aculeus
 
To: maxwell; Robert A. Cook, PE
    max, is this the kind of stuff you play around with all day?
2
posted on 
09/16/2002 7:29:28 AM PDT
by 
xsmommy
 
To: aculeus
    This is weird BUMP.
3
posted on 
09/16/2002 7:31:10 AM PDT
by 
mercy
 
To: aculeus
    Amazing! Faster processing time means another step towards meaningful artificial intelligence. This means another step towards autonomous battlefield "robots". (Pretty scary in way) 
(If Bell Laboratories can hire these guys, maybe Lucent stock will become worth something again.)
 
4
posted on 
09/16/2002 7:31:58 AM PDT
by 
BenLurkin
 
To: aculeus
    Signals also get weaker and more distorted the faster they go, so in theory no useful information can get transmitted at faster-than-light speeds, though Robertson hopes his students and others can now rigorously and cheaply test those ideas.  Given that the peak can be observed, and its speed measured, this statement seems to be incorrect. A frequency modulation scheme would seem to offer a way of transmitting information.
 
5
posted on 
09/16/2002 7:33:55 AM PDT
by 
r9etb
 
To: aculeus
    Signals also get weaker and more distorted the faster they go, so in theory no useful information can get transmitted at faster-than-light speeds,That is not true, since by accurately timing the distortion you could take it into account. As well, sending a known test signal down the line before transmitting data would allow you to adjust for any slight differences due to temperature, etc.
 
6
posted on 
09/16/2002 7:34:35 AM PDT
by 
ikka
 
To: aculeus
    Alot of the slowdown in the future is not going to be the rate at which our computers receive data, but at how it processes it. You throw 200 GB in one second at your computer and see what happens.
7
posted on 
09/16/2002 7:35:43 AM PDT
by 
dogbyte12
 
To: aculeus
    bump .... so where's the warp drive already ? ;) 
To: aculeus
    Speed of light broken with basic lab kit... Wasn't me, I was taking a shower!
 I hope this isn't series.
 
To: mercy; All
    Now physicists at Middle Tennessee State University have broken that speed limit over distances of nearly ...  Another reason not to fixate on "prestige" universities.
 
10
posted on 
09/16/2002 7:40:31 AM PDT
by 
aculeus
 
To: aculeus
    Ha! And I've been snickering at my six-year-old son's plan to build his own rocket. When I explained that he'd have to study and then work for NASA, he said, "No, we can just go shopping at Home Depot." Maybe the kid is right.
To: FreedomFarmer
    I think it's very series. One day we will be able to send messages from the Moon to the Earth at faster than the speed of light. Then a father could explain to his kids that the Moon isn't made of cheese, while his son could tell the father all about how a moose bit his sister..., and all in record time.
To: aculeus
    "In a related announcement, the staff of Middle Tennessee State University have 'solved' the Unified Field Theory utilizing six soda straws, three empty beer cans, a ten-year-old Timex man's watch (leather band), twenty feet of plastic tubing (1/4" diameter), and duct tape."
To: aculeus; xsmommy
    Well, of course this isn't really news....
The National press corpse used to get their daily fax followup questions and spin briefing from the dnc even before the the media broadcast the first batch of lies from Hillary's White House.
To: Tired of Taxes
    Maybe the kid is right.  In a sense he is right. You really can build most of the necessary stuff from readily-available materials and get to some sort of orbit. 
 The cost comes when you start trying for high performance, precision, reliability, and (for manned flight) getting the crew home alive.
 
15
posted on 
09/16/2002 7:57:39 AM PDT
by 
r9etb
 
To: Notforprophet
    Some politician is gonna demand a speed limit be set and enforced, for 'da chilwrens', with his sister's cousin's second step-critter in charge of 'rite'n dem speeders up' for life.
To: aculeus
    I knew that appointing Jethro Bodine to the Middle Tennessee faculty would finally pay off!
17
posted on 
09/16/2002 8:00:00 AM PDT
by 
ArcLight
 
To: RightOnline
    LOL! Now if they could just solve the problem of chewing tobacco dribble, they'd be state heroes!
To: FreedomFarmer
    NYTimes: "Speed of Light Broken: Women and Minorities Hit Hardest."
To: aculeus
    QUESTION TO ALL:
  
 Doesn't Einstein's theory imply that if something travels faster than the speed of light, it would travel backward in time?
  
 That means if an electronic signal is traveling along a certain length of cable then the signal would arrive at it's destination at a point in space time prior to the point in space time that the switch was thrown to SEND THE SIGNAL in the first place. (Theme to jeopardy playing in background) 
  
 Any thoughts?.....And the SURVEY SAID?: 
 
20
posted on 
09/16/2002 8:02:25 AM PDT
by 
webboss
 
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
 first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-107 next  last
    Disclaimer:
    Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
    posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
    management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
    exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson