Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Nightmare Before Xmas, or Saddam Will Have the Bomb by Xmas Unless We Invade Before Halloween
London Times ^ | September 15, 2002 | Thud

Posted on 09/15/2002 5:52:18 PM PDT by Thud

Iraq 'will have nuclear bomb in months'

By Katty Kay in Washington, Paul Martin and Melissa Kite
Bush security chief tells of Saddam links with al-Qaeda

IRAQ could produce nuclear weapons within months using pirated German equipment and uranium smuggled from Brazil, according to a dissident Iraqi nuclear scientist.

The revelations painting an alarming picture of President Saddam Hussein’s nuclear capabilities came as the White House made its strongest link yet between Saddam and al-Qaeda, and demanded a United Nations resolution as soon as this week.

Dr Khidir Hamza, who was science adviser to the Atomic Energy Establishment and later helped to start and direct Iraq’s nuclear bomb programme before he defected in 1994, claims in an interview with The Times today that Saddam could be in a position to make three nuclear weapons within the next few months, if he has not already done so.

Dr Hamza gave warning that UN inspectors would be useless because even if they were given “unfettered access” they would find it far more difficult than before to detect the nuclear assembly line. “The beauty of the present system is that the units are each very small and in the four years since the inspectors left they will have been concealed underground or in basements or buildings that outwardly seem normal,” Dr Hamza said.

Dr Hamza gave evidence before Senator Joe Biden’s Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings on Iraq in Washington last August but it was only after the recent International Institute for Strategic Studies report on the threat from Saddam that he became aware of the West’s imperfect understanding of the urgency of the situation.

Dr Hamza’s new estimation of the speed with which a nuclear bomb could be produced is centred on the number of pirated centrifuges that Baghdad has been able to produce and the rapidity with which the re-processing programme is being undertaken. The scientist’s intelligence suggests a more immediate threat than reported last week by the IISS, which concluded that Iraq could make a bomb only if it smuggled in the necessary uranium or radioactive material.

According to Dr Hamza, that material is already inside Iraq and is currently being processed to weapons grade. He said that Iraq was using a centrifuge method to get a bomb which is easier and quicker than other methods. “Unless he’s stopped soon, Saddam will have set up a whole nuclear bomb industry, not just have made a couple of bombs,” Dr Hamza said.

The Bush Administration yesterday made its strongest public connection between Iraq and al-Qaeda. National Security Adviser, Condoleezza Rice, said that al-Qaeda personnel had been spotted in Baghdad and that the Iraqi regime had ties to the network.

Until now the Administration has shied away from linking Iraq to al-Qaeda, prompting widespread speculation that the US had no evidence of links between the two. Yesterday Dr Rice suggested that was not the case: “Iraq has clearly links with terrorism that would include al-Qaeda.”

Dr Rice backed away from any implication that Saddam was involved in the September 11 attacks, but said that there was sufficient evidence against him to justify action without ties to the attacks on New York and Washington. “Let’s be clear. There’s plenty to indict Saddam Hussein without a direct link to 9/11,” she said.

There were growing signs that the international community was moving in America’s favour to support an urgent UN deadline for Iraq to readmit weapons inspectors. Washington maintained pressure on the international community to move fast and start work on resolutions in the next few days. “I expect we’d work on a resolution in fairly short order, in the next week,” Dr Rice said.

In a key strategic victory for the US, Saudi Arabia said yestrday that if America had UN authority, it would be allowed to use bases in the desert kingdom for an attack against Iraq.

Jack Straw, at the UN General Assembly, said there was a growing consensus about the nature of the demands to be imposed on the Iraqi regime. The Foreign Secretary said that the five permanent members of the UN Security Council — the US, Britain, France, China and Russia — had not yet made a final decision about whether there would be one resolution or two.

As diplomats discussed their options for Baghdad, US and British jets bombed an air defence communications facility near Tallil, 160 miles (257km) south of Baghdad. There were no reports of casualties.


TOPICS: Extended News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bomb; iraq; saddam; terrorism
Yeah, right. There are piles of good reasons for conquering Iraq. This breathless discovery is so cynically timed that it distracts attention from the good reasons.
1 posted on 09/15/2002 5:52:18 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Thud
IRAQ could produce nuclear weapons within months using pirated German equipment and uranium smuggled from Brazil, according to a dissident Iraqi nuclear scientist.

Enough evidence for you, Napoleon Daschle?

Isn't it time Tom Anushead was given a thermobaric enema?

2 posted on 09/15/2002 5:57:22 PM PDT by PhilDragoo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
Whatever works... bombs away.
3 posted on 09/15/2002 5:57:46 PM PDT by MedicalMess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
Whatever works... bombs away.
4 posted on 09/15/2002 5:58:49 PM PDT by MedicalMess
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud; niki; RnMomof7
Dr Rice backed away from any implication that Saddam
was involved in the September 11 attacks, but said that there was
sufficient evidence against him to justify action without ties
to the attacks on New York and Washington. “Let’s be clear.
There’s plenty to indict Saddam Hussein without a direct link to 9/11,” she said

Yup, but no link to 9/11, which too few of us
on this board have been saying for too long.

5 posted on 09/15/2002 6:16:05 PM PDT by gcruse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
There were growing signs that the international community was moving in America’s favour to support an urgent UN deadline for Iraq to readmit weapons inspectors.

Well, there you go again!

It's the same old cannard about "readmitting weapons inspectors", as if that is what this brouhaha is all about and what will solve the problem if we can only get Saddam to admit them.

But, that's not what Bush said. There was much more in his demands. However, the Left will continue to disguise and deflect this into purely a discussion about "readmitting weapons inspectors". So will Saddam, if he can get away with it.

6 posted on 09/15/2002 6:18:00 PM PDT by Gritty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thud
But...but... Scott Ritter said that Hamza is a fraud.
7 posted on 09/15/2002 6:18:23 PM PDT by Former_russian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MedicalMess
Ya' know, if you say it twice while snapping your fingers, you get three wishes!

Couldn't resist...
8 posted on 09/15/2002 6:19:49 PM PDT by Sweet_Sunflower29
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Thud
Is that you, Scott?
9 posted on 09/15/2002 6:34:16 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
When and if any intelligence gets leaked, the Dems will just say "it's government propaganda for war". Their talking points are in the can.

They should be careful what they wish for.



10 posted on 09/15/2002 6:39:00 PM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PhilDragoo
Whatever works...bombs away.
11 posted on 09/15/2002 6:57:16 PM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Thud
Why would Iraq smuggle uranium from Brazil when it has uranium mines inside of Iraq?
12 posted on 09/15/2002 7:12:44 PM PDT by Lessismore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Nope
13 posted on 09/15/2002 8:04:37 PM PDT by Thud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lessismore
"Why would Iraq smuggle uranium from Brazil when it has uranium mines inside of Iraq?"

May be the Brazilian is a higher grade that requires less processing?

14 posted on 09/15/2002 8:15:26 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: blam
Especially if Brazil's nuclear program is humming away unnoticed....
15 posted on 09/15/2002 10:06:53 PM PDT by Cobra Scott
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Yeah, "Hey Saddam, Trick or Treat!!!".
16 posted on 09/15/2002 10:33:51 PM PDT by dsutah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: joesnuffy
Whatever works...bombs away.

The boys are itching to go to finally take this dirtbag out.

17 posted on 09/16/2002 6:15:09 AM PDT by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Lessismore
Converting uranium ore to enriched uranium is a complex process with a lot of intermediate steps. They probably could not do anything with uranium ore.
18 posted on 09/16/2002 6:20:35 AM PDT by far sider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson