To: Diogenesis
Here's the crux of the whole thing:
Collier- Well, I think the main problem there is that there were two reporters who actually had come up with really massive evidence of vote fraud, and then when they went to get it to the Media, the Media was unwilling to investigate the charges. And so, of course, because the Media is so powerful, they couldn't get anywhere with the story. And if that ever is truly a problem, as it had been, considering that you ARE the Media, then the question comes into play; Is there a citizen watchdog group, and an independent media source that could report on vote fraud? How could they do it, if you're the Media, and you're in the process of counting the votes, and nobody's allowed in to watch the process?
5 posted on
09/12/2002 4:52:02 AM PDT by
ovrtaxt
To: ovrtaxt
"Well, I think the main problem there is that there were two reporters who actually had come up with really massive evidence of vote fraud..." Shades of TBF?
8 posted on
09/12/2002 5:11:58 AM PDT by
4CJ
To: ovrtaxt
This is related, but not directly -
In Ann Coulter's Slander, she lists how soon the networks called each state after the VNS results (which only they can see) are in.
If a state was going for Gore, they'd call it anywhere from before the polls closed up to 1 hour after the networks got the VNS data.
States breaking for Bush were delayed for up to 3 1/2 hours after the results were in.
Nope, no bias or attempt to influence elections here, just move along.
Given this documented information, how can we trust the media to keep tabs on Democrat vote fraud? How can we trust them not to actually be complicit with Democrat vote fraud?
22 posted on
09/12/2002 6:17:34 AM PDT by
MrB
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson