Posted on 09/10/2002 7:16:04 PM PDT by mjp
Brilliant rebuttal. But do you have substantive problems with my answer, or do you just prefer to insult anyone who happens to post anything factually correct? Predicting whether public or private researchers will discover a cure for cancer first (assuming such a thing exists, which seems unlikely) is a matter best left to fortune tellers, not political ideology.
But then you've stated that no PhDs work in the private sector, so you've already outed yourself as a complete moron. As a Phudnik myself (albeit in a non-scientific field), I've been making on the order of twenty times in the private sector what I earned working for the government.
From his profile;
Why are you looking at my profile? I'm just another fiercely anti-ideological pragmatic neo-conservative atheist. I welcome all hate freepmail.
I'm still trying to recover from two original sins: a brief stint in the Carter White House (held over from the Ford Admin.), and an equally brief professorship at the Kennedy School. I apologize for that.
And as an entrepreneur, I am acutely aware of the limitations of specialized education on the usefulness of a human being towards accomplishing objectives, such as a cure for death by cancer.
Sad to say, but Phucks like you claim to be, in my opinion, are overpaid underachievers who aspire to debate the merits of navel lint. Stay away from anything that matters, such as life and death.
Cancer will be cured by anyone but academics.
But thank you for revealing his self-confessed precursors for being an a$$hole - Carter (Socialist incompetent) administration, atheism, academic indoctrination.
From this we all can learn - save your children, before it's too late.
My guess is Mideast policy advisor, in that it was a stunning failure, a prelude to the Islamic rising that led to 9/11.
A$$hole.
The best reason for the FDA requirements is found in cases where those requirements have been bypassed in the name of expedience.
Two examples:
1. Recall the big AZT acceleration for AIDS? The Lancet later published an article demonstrating that it caused more harm than good.
2. Recall the disaster announced last year in the clinical trials for fetal tissue implants to combat Parkinson's disease?
A "miracle cure" like this seems wonderful -- but it's also potentially a disaster: they're basically sending a virus to fight a virus. It'd be a Bad Thing if this ended up mutating into some deadly third virus.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.