Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US Senate votes to ban mercury fever thermometers
REUTERS NEWS SERVICE ^ | September 9, 2002

Posted on 09/10/2002 9:56:27 AM PDT by Korth

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 next last
To: general_re
the water carried through Roman pipes was all cold water, and might not have actually absorbed much lead. But maybe it had some effect ;)

Their food was prepared in leadware and that probably was a much bigger factor than water pipes. The following snippet is more to the point:

"The ancient Romans used lead for making water pipes, cooking utensils, water tanks and storage vessels. Lead water pipes were used in most major cities in the empire. Wine was cheap in ancient Rome and Athens and it was contaminated with lead from as many as 14 sources during its preparation. Lead was used as part of the preservative and as a flavor enhancer."

121 posted on 09/10/2002 2:27:39 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
Definitely a disincentive to playing sick to get out of school!

You gave me an idea. I'm going to get an electronic thermometer powered with 2 'D' batteries. That'll keep them school.

122 posted on 09/10/2002 2:32:09 PM PDT by Vinnie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Korth
...as well as violating the tenth amendment...

Bingo!

1. Technology was solving the problem anyway.

2. We are talking about a tiny amount of mercury contamination.

3. Inventers are now inhibited from new ideas.

4. It violates our rights.

123 posted on 09/10/2002 2:35:44 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brandon
Why not inform the consumer, hmmm? Why tell people 'this is the law' when you can simply inform? Congress could issue a press release and encourage consumers as they see fit. Instead, they make their demands. People didn't even need congress to tell them for goodness sake. Who buys a mercury thermometer anymore? What store sells one? You could even call for a boycott of stores, for goodness sake.

I am SICK of living in a nanny state that locks up people because their child has a sunburn, runs people off of parking lots for doing jumping jacks, and tells people 'You CAN'T buy this.'

124 posted on 09/10/2002 2:41:07 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Diddle E. Squat
>>Ha, I remember as a kid wishing someone would ban those rectal thermometers. Definitely a disincentive to playing sick to get out of school!<<

Went to Catholic school?

125 posted on 09/10/2002 2:45:12 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
The whole thing is about covering up for mercury pollution caused by commercial manufacturing. It is not about pollution from discarded thermometers. By passing an ACT against the thermometers, the greenies are satisfied, the public thinks the gov't is doing something about it, and the companies which actually are responsible for toxic mercury compounds going into the groundwater are allowed to keep doing so without fines/levies/complicated+expensive filtering processes etc. They can therefore keep paying bribes and campaign contributions to Politicians.
126 posted on 09/10/2002 2:46:10 PM PDT by UCANSEE2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: Redcloak
The REAL reason they're doing this is because of "unsubstantiated" reports that Al Qaeda operatives are purchasing an unusual number of mercury thermometers.

I can't speak to any alleged Al Qaeda usage, but there's a few Texans who use it to tip their hollow points.

; )

127 posted on 09/10/2002 2:51:50 PM PDT by Freebird Forever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Ah....! I smelled a rat on this one. You pegged it. A large amount of mercury IS a serious hazard. Even I agree with that. Freegards....
128 posted on 09/10/2002 3:00:47 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 126 | View Replies]

To: Moosilauke; LurkingSince'98
I'm no chemist and am only repeating what I was told by chemists and biologists.

The mercury from gold mining that got into tributaries to the Sacramento River is no danger by itself. It accumulates in crevices and bottom mud. But anaerobic bacteria go to work on it, absorbing it into their systems. They in turn are eaten by snails, etc. which are eaten by fish. I'm not sure of the chemistry involved but mercury collects in animal tissues and is not excreted. It is passed on and on until it ends up in our frying pans and barbecues. I was told that's why mercury from batteries is dangerous in landfills. It's the absence of oxygen that allows it to be converted by bacteria into methylmercury. If I'm wrong blame my sources.
129 posted on 09/10/2002 3:02:49 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: Freebird Forever
...there's a few Texans who use it to tip their hollow points.

I wouldn't recommend anyone breaking into your house, especially in Texas!

130 posted on 09/10/2002 3:03:37 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
Lead was used as part of the preservative and as a flavor enhancer.

No wonder Romans became as mad as hatters! LOL. What period of Roman history was lead commonly put in food as a flavor enhancer?

131 posted on 09/10/2002 3:09:25 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
You know, people keep stabbing themselves with forks. If we put our minds to it, we can prepare all food to be consumed with spoons. Should we outlaw forks next? I also recommend Brothers Outraged Over Bathtubs.
132 posted on 09/10/2002 3:13:42 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 129 | View Replies]

To: rhombus
This is just like those new 'Hardly effective' 2/3/4 gallon toilets.Of all the possible things to ban.Why am I not surprised at the stupidity of our elected officials?Eventually, the whiners (Libs) won't have anything left to complain about,because everything will have been banned,in the name of 'Conservation'.Please spare me.
133 posted on 09/10/2002 3:17:20 PM PDT by Pagey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Actually, as a goldsmith I'll be delighted to see mercury thermometers phased out. Mercury gloms onto gold like mud on a pig. Nurses, especially, are constantly breaking thermometers and 'mercury-plating' their prized gold rings. Removing it is one of the nastier jobs a jeweler faces. It has to be done with heat and breathing the fumes is decidedly bad for the health. It's a job I'd just as soon never do again.
134 posted on 09/10/2002 3:25:19 PM PDT by Bernard Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 132 | View Replies]

To: Orual
Does anyone know the side effects of mercury poisoning other than death?

For a brief graphical summary, see post #31.

135 posted on 09/10/2002 3:31:16 PM PDT by Erasmus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Korth
I can not believe this!!!!

The Senate has time to vote on this bill but not time to bring up the Partial Birth Abortion Ban??????

136 posted on 09/10/2002 3:31:42 PM PDT by mware
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cinFLA
Actually, this has already happened.

On August 9, 1945, a quanity of plutonium that Ralph Nader has assured us was sufficient to kill everyone on the Earth at the time WAS released into the atmosphere.

And I guess the fears were justified. A large number of the people alive at that time are now dead, and most of the survivors are expected to die within a decade or so.

137 posted on 09/10/2002 3:56:43 PM PDT by Oztrich Boy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: PaulKersey
No I don't, please do not put words in my mouth (or keyboard), but I think it's a pretty good indicator that this bill is free from enviro-nuttyness, because if it wasn't, I don't think it would get past conservative senators without a fight. There was no fight, which leads me to believe there is no nuttiness afoot.
138 posted on 09/10/2002 5:30:16 PM PDT by Tony Niar Brain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Bernard Marx
I'm sure that Vermont is delighted that we are forced to pay more for milk than we'd have to if the dairy industry were deregulated. Freedom, friend. Freedom.
139 posted on 09/10/2002 5:33:16 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: PaulKersey
Different drops spread over different backyards will have no effect whatever.
If you insist, fine, it has no effect what-so-ever.

Do you also oppose peeing in the woods on environmental grounds? Have you ever BEEN in the woods?
Yes, as a devoted environmentalist, I am against any and all peeing in the woods. That goes for bears and deer and squirrels as well; I hear they have lots of them in the woods, and they simply must cease this offensive behavior. So there.

140 posted on 09/10/2002 5:36:39 PM PDT by Tony Niar Brain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140141-156 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson