Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Think Tank Warns of Iraq's Abilities
AP ^ | 9/9/02 | BARRY RENFREW, Associated Press Writer

Posted on 09/09/2002 4:04:48 PM PDT by efnwriter

Think Tank Warns of Iraq's Abilities
Mon Sep 9, 2:22 PM ET

By BARRY RENFREW, Associated Press Writer

LONDON (AP) - Iraq could build a nuclear bomb in a few months if it obtained radioactive material, and its arsenal contains powerful chemical and biological weapons that can be quickly mass produced, according to a report Monday.

Photo
AP Photo


(AP Video)

(AP Video)


9/11
Special Coverage
News, features,
photos and more.

Go there now.


Developing weapons of mass destruction is one of Iraq's top priorities, and Saddam Hussein ( news - web sites) devotes enormous resources to such weapons, the report by the International Institute for Strategic Studies said.

"War, sanctions and inspections have reversed and retarded, but not eliminated, Iraq's nuclear, biological and chemical weapons and long-range missile capacity, nor removed Baghdad's enduring interest in developing these capabilities," said the institute's director John Chipman.

Left unhindered, it "seems likely that the current Iraqi regime will eventually achieve its objectives," the report said.

The report, compiled by a range of experts, focused particular concern on Iraq's efforts to develop nuclear weapons. It expressed concern that a nuclear weapon, if developed, could fall into the hands of terrorists.

Although Baghdad appears several years away, at least, from making its own nuclear or fissile material for a bomb, it could get the material from a foreign source and construct a weapon quickly, the report said.

"If, somehow, Iraq were able to acquire sufficient nuclear material from foreign sources, it could probably produce nuclear weapons on short order, probably in a matter of months," the report said.

The report gave no evidence that Iraq has been able to obtain nuclear materials. There has been concern about nuclear material being sold on the black market in parts of the former Soviet Union.

Iraq retains significant biological and chemical weapons and, more importantly, the ability to quickly produce more stocks, the report said.

Iraq probably possesses hundreds of tons of chemical weapons or agents for their production, including mustard and sarin gas, the report said.

On biological weapons, Iraq could have large stocks of biological warfare agents, including, possibly, thousands of gallons of deadly anthrax, the report said.

The report, presented as an impartial and technical analysis, echoed similar warnings from various government and private analysts and did not appear to contain much new information.

"There's a tremendous unknown," one of the authors, Gary Samore, told a press conference.

Prime Minister Tony Blair ( news - web sites)'s office welcomed the report, but said it would soon publish its own dossier on Iraq's weapons program, containing intelligence information not available to the report's authors.

The institute report said that while Iraq has significant weapons of mass destruction, the threat is diminished by its limited ability to deliver them.

It probably has about 12 missiles with a range of 400 miles, but lacks the technology to use them to deliver nuclear weapons, if they are ever acquired, the report said. A nuclear weapon could be delivered by a plane or commandos, it said.

The missiles with a 400-mile range "could hit Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Israel, Iran, Turkey," said Chipman.

Similarly, Iraq's ability to deliver chemical and biological weapons is limited, mostly dependent on a few old planes and missiles. But the weapons could pose a threat to U.S. and allied forces and civilians in the region in the event of a war, it said.

The United States has been calling for action to stop Iraq's efforts to build weapons of mass destruction, saying Baghdad poses a threat to U.S. and international interests.

The report said attacking Iraq risks incurring Iraqi retaliation with weapons of mass destruction, but doing nothing risks allowing Baghdad to develop more weapons.

"Either course of action carries risks. Wait and the threat will grow. Strike and the threat may be used," it concluded.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iraq; nuclear; nuke; wmd
Bump
1 posted on 09/09/2002 4:04:49 PM PDT by efnwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: efnwriter
FAE good for unknown.

Muttly votes for incinerating unknown.
2 posted on 09/09/2002 4:06:06 PM PDT by PoorMuttly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: efnwriter
Democrat leaders in Congress, and some Republicans, won't be convinced Iraq should be a target until someone sets off an Iraqi nuke in a major US city. I don't want to wait that long. Let's roll.
3 posted on 09/09/2002 4:06:43 PM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: efnwriter
Secret Satellite Photos To Be Unveiled
4 posted on 09/09/2002 4:13:54 PM PDT by USA21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
watch Hannity and Colmes tonight. They have tape showing the complete reversal of policies on Iraq. It ought to be great.
5 posted on 09/09/2002 4:14:40 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: efnwriter
Heard it from me, first. I assumed that Saddam would be pushing extra hard, feeling Bush breathing down his neck. Now, I predict that the time table could be moved up even more quickly than they think today. Bottom line, we can't afford to sit on our hands another week. Saddam continues to work more quickly than is thought possible. Momentum and history says that everyone has been underestimating him. We must bomb and break things ASAP. Destroy infrastructure and communications. Sure, take our time about sending in troops. But quit waiting for committees. We need decisive leadership.
6 posted on 09/09/2002 4:22:22 PM PDT by Arthur Wildfire! March
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon Fan
It's fantastic. Brit had it on his show at 5pm CST. Catch the replay - if you can. There was also a nice hit on Ritter.
7 posted on 09/09/2002 4:38:41 PM PDT by July 4th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon Fan
Thanks for the heads-up.
8 posted on 09/09/2002 4:41:58 PM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: efnwriter
It's time for America to take out the trash. Iraq is up to bat, who's on deck? (My vote is for Saudi.)
9 posted on 09/09/2002 5:06:17 PM PDT by Excuse_My_Bellicosity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: efnwriter
Bump To anything i have ever said wrong about our government ...President Bush has my respect and whatever he says im ready as a vet
10 posted on 09/09/2002 5:07:57 PM PDT by ClearasaBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
You called that correctly, it's time to roll!
11 posted on 09/09/2002 5:31:11 PM PDT by exnavy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon Fan
watch Hannity and Colmes tonight. They have tape showing the complete reversal of policies on Iraq. It ought to be great.

Thanks for the head's up.

BTW, my son (8) is a huge 24 fan.

I prefer brown.....

like.....88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88

Sorry, darn keyboard went crazy on me!

LVM

12 posted on 09/09/2002 6:01:12 PM PDT by LasVegasMac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
IMO, a massive attack on 9.11 against Iraq would be poetic justice.

I would love to hear President Bush announce to the UN on Sep 12, "This great nation could not wait for you pussy-footing, politically correct, but tragically misguided, imps to recognize the danger that is on the doorstep of the world. At 8:46 EST, planes bearing the flags of the United States and Great Britain commenced bombing of multiple facilities in Iraq....."

A girl can dream, can't she??

13 posted on 09/09/2002 6:07:42 PM PDT by BeaArthur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BeaArthur
BeaArthur. Wasn't she the liberal wacko who played "Maude".
14 posted on 09/09/2002 8:33:00 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
See my reply What Smoking Gun!
15 posted on 09/09/2002 8:37:53 PM PDT by reg45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: efnwriter
Now where have we heard all this before? Hmmmmmmmmmmm
16 posted on 09/09/2002 9:30:26 PM PDT by brat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
Any fight or dispute carries the risk of unwanted consequences. But when the decision factors call for a fight, the one who hits first and hardest typically wins.

Considering we are dealing with liars, cheats, and thiefs who have no intent of honoring any peace agreement without force, and further, wish death to our nation, we need to act now.
17 posted on 09/10/2002 7:38:11 AM PDT by Tiger Tail
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
Of course it can be ramped up.
It only has to work, not work efficiently,
a 50% yield will be quite enough, even perhaps as low as 20%.
All it has to do is go off.
18 posted on 09/10/2002 7:42:56 AM PDT by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Tiger Tail
It's now clear that the strategy of the Democrats is to stall on any commitment to move against Iraq until after the elections. They realize that to move now, or soon, would give President Bush, and likely the Republicans, a boost in the polls. This is another example of why the Democrats are the "evil party" -- placing partisan interests ahead of the security of this nation.
19 posted on 09/10/2002 9:48:25 AM PDT by My2Cents
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson