Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First commercial Moon landing gets go-ahead
WorldNetDaily ^ | 05 September 2002 | KENDALL POWELL

Posted on 09/06/2002 7:15:16 AM PDT by Onelifetogive

First commercial Moon landing gets go-ahead
Small step for commercialization of Moon surface.

The first private Moon landing has won government authorization. The decision opens the door to the commercialization of the Moon's surface.

The US State Department and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration have granted TransOrbital, Inc. of La Jolla, California, permission to send its TrailBlazer probe to map the surface of the Moon and photograph Earth. The launch is scheduled for June 2003 from the Baikonur Cosmodrome in Kazakhstan.

"The Moon is ripe for commercial development," says Dennis Laurie, head of TransOrbital. "It's a lot closer than you think, at least in travel time, which is four days."

The permit process took more than two years and twenty centimeters of paperwork to complete. TransOrbital had to prove it would not contaminate the Moon with biological material, pollute the surface, or disturb any historical landing sites.

Laurie predicts that the Moon will support similar activities to today's Earth satellites. In the long term, TransOrbital hopes to develop communications and navigation systems for Moon exploration and tourism. "Costs [of Moon travel] will be coming down and opportunities going up," says Laurie.

Several other private companies are pursuing Moon missions. LunaCorp of Fairfax, Virginia, hopes to put SuperSat, a high-bandwidth live video satellite, into Moon orbit in 2003. The company's president, David Gump, says LunaCorp also plan to send their IceBreaker rover into "craters where the sun doesn't shine" in search of lunar polar ice.

But Wendell Mendell of NASA's office for human exploration at the Johnson Space Center in Houston contends that public efforts will make it to the Moon before commercial endeavours, and cites European and Japanese trips scheduled for the next year.

NASA is showing renewed interest in the Moon since the Lunar Prospector mission of 1998-99, he adds. The mission aided technologies for the Mars missions and found hints of water at the lunar poles.

"The Moon is going to get some due, no matter what," says Mendell. He thinks funding will be a significant obstacle to commercial enterprises. Lunar Prospector, which was similar to TransOrbital's TrailBlazer, cost $63 million.

TransOrbital and LunaCorp intend to fund their endeavours through corporate endorsements and by licensing video footage and images obtained by their spacecraft for advertising, education and entertainment - such as immersive video games that leave players feeling as if they've been to the Moon and back.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: moon; nasasucks; notworldnetdaily; one; small; step; thenextstep
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: GATOR NAVY
>>?<<

The coffee & Clapton reference. "Big Grin"

41 posted on 09/06/2002 9:03:03 AM PDT by SerpentDove
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AllSmiles
I said her father thought that, not her. Don't mess with my high school memories of first love ;-)
42 posted on 09/06/2002 9:13:24 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: SerpentDove
Ok, got it now. BG confused me.
43 posted on 09/06/2002 9:15:05 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
Yeah, I'm just pissed because Wendell doesn't realize that he should be talking to the reporter from Moonbase Reagan and touting the success NASA is having exploring Mars.

Without having to spend resources fueling launches from the earth it would be a lot cheaper exploring the rest of the solar system from the moon.

44 posted on 09/06/2002 9:16:09 AM PDT by Gothmog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Onelifetogive
Awesome!

I want to be a lunar tourist someday.
45 posted on 09/06/2002 9:18:13 AM PDT by The FRugitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gothmog
"Yeah, I'm just pissed because Wendell doesn't realize that he should be talking to the reporter from Moonbase Reagan and touting the success NASA is having exploring Mars."

I agree with you wholeheartedly.

"Without having to spend resources fueling launches from the earth it would be a lot cheaper exploring the rest of the solar system from the moon."

Yes and No. If that's it's only use, no. Compared to transit from Earth to Somewhere Else, you still have to expend more energy to go from Earth to Moon, then Moon to Somewhere Else. BUT, if you are building a sustained base of settlers, tourists, and researchers with industry and commerce beyond a refueling depot, then the picture changes into a big fat yes.
46 posted on 09/06/2002 9:25:41 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: The FRugitive
"I wanna be a spaceman ranger..."
47 posted on 09/06/2002 9:26:15 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
I Want To Be a PowerPoint Ranger
48 posted on 09/06/2002 9:44:59 AM PDT by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
The Shuttle is NOT a good platform to modify for Lunar transit and exploration. Even with all the control surfaces removed, it is far too heavy for any propulsion technology available.

Way to heavy indeed. The layman might confuse weight with mass, and while the Shuttle is "weightless" out there in space (orbit), its mass is the same as on the ground, and it is a heavy mofo.

49 posted on 09/06/2002 10:51:58 AM PDT by Paradox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Paradox
the Space Shuttle would be a perfect vehicle for a "modern" trip to the moon

It could be done, but it would need some modifications, mostly in the fuel capacity as you say.

If it is to be launched from the ground like Saturn, it would need a new first stage, and it would be really, really big, like 1000' feet tall. Or the Space Shuttle could be refueled in earth orbit; that would be much more likely to happen. Then when the Space shuttle returns to earth, it wouldn't be able to come directly back through the atmosphere; it would have to be slowed to earth orbit speed first. More fuel.

An earth-moon shuttle is the best way for regular flights from earth orbit to moon orbit and back, but the Space Shuttle carries a lot of excess weight in those wings and airframe that a true space shuttle wouldn't need.

50 posted on 09/06/2002 12:26:58 PM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson