Check out this Reuters Caption (before it disappears)

Yahoo News, Reuters ^ | 9/5/02

[SuziQ]

What a gaping wound Ground Zero is! I pray for the President's safety in NY next Tues. & Wed.

[SuziQ]

This is a real example of a subliminal message.

I don't think it is subliminal at all! It's right out there for everyone to see! Now some folks may 'read' it differently than others, but there's no hiding what the author believes and wants US to believe!

[Redcloak]

I just sent this to them via email...

Would you kindly explain the meaning of this caption on one of your photos...

Recovery and debris removal work continues at the site of the World Trade Center known as "ground zero" in New York, March 25, 2002. Human rights around the world have been a casualty of the U.S. "war on terror" since September 11. REUTERS/Peter Morgan

How does one conclude from looking at this photo that Human rights around the world have been a casualty of the U.S. "war on terror"?

[Gritty]

Reuters = Socialist Propaganda Organ

[DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet]

And I sent it to Brit Hume for his Grapevine segment.

Good idea.

[tomkat]

anyone desiring their own copy of the evidence may get it here:

caution: 140k jpg

[jpl]

Sounds to me like Peter Morgan and Reuters might be supporters of terrorists.

[Redcloak]

Morgan's just a photographer who works NYC for Reuters. Some sleezebag editor wrote the caption.

[Redcloak]

Want a good laugh? Check out Reuters' editorial policy.

[firebrand]

To put this caption anywhere is Islaminazi propaganda. To put it under this particular photo is to moon Americans up close and personal in the process.

[paul51]

What a gaping wound Ground Zero is

Was there many times pre 9/11 and then last month for the first time post 9/11. Given the perspective of previous visits and the pictures in the media after 9/11, I was surprised at the actual appearance of the site in actual perspective. I was expecting it to look larger for some reason. I think the almost overwhelming impact on my psychic is more influenced by memories and images I've seen in the media rather than viewing the site itself although that was certainly sad also.

[July 4th]

And I sent it to Brit Hume for his Grapevine segment.

And he just ran it. Nice job, and thanks Brit!

[abner]

And he just ran it. Nice job, and thanks Brit!

Cool! Now I will have to stay up.

[hellinahandcart]

What did Brit say? I am amazingly glad he mentioned it at all (it's gonna piss off tons of people), but what did he say about it? Was he angry, contemptuous, sarcastic, withering, what?

[July 4th]

What did Brit say?

He had just done 20 seconds or so on the Washington Post's false characterization of James Baker's op-ed, and then used that as a segue to bring up the Reuters piece. There wasn't really a comment, other than leading into the bit by saying something like "From the people who banned the word terrorist in their newsroom..."

[justshe]

I SAW that. I am running about 75% placement......LOL.

Think he pays 'stringer fees'?

[Prodigal Son]

And he just ran it. Nice job, and thanks Brit!

Good Job!

[ppaul]

More.....

CNN does a "Reuters" (will now refer to terrorists as "alleged" hijackers)

My letter to Reuters

Time to FReep Reuters

Reuters: Not "terrorism" but "Holy War"

[Ipberg]

Thanks Tomcat for ensuring this will be copied onto thousands of hard drives and emailed around the world into perpetuity!

[tomkat]

my pleasure, and sorry to be so tardy, but have been mired in cheese over here