Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lord_Baltar
Nothing requires you to take these threads seriously, but then again, nothing requires us to take you seriously.
40 posted on 09/05/2002 6:13:16 AM PDT by copycat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: copycat
You know, it's funny Copy, you seem to imply that making light of anything regarding all this somehow equates to being Pro-Saddam.

However, it has been brought up, here in fact, that don't you think if Saddam Hussein was indeed directly involved with OKC, might not McVeigh or Terry Nichols maybe would have mentioned this somewhere along the way?

I mean seriously, don't you think ol' Timmy would have dropped a dime on Saddam, prior to being given his injection? Wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that Terry might be willing to point a finger or two at Saddam, just to lighten his sentence, just a wee bit?

Yet, both have denied any connection by Saddam Hussein to OKC.

I know for some of you, the idea of anything contradicting anything that comes out of our Government is akin to blasphemy.

However, the vein of my post was sarcasm and humor. If someone has a hard time discerning that (ie The iceberg reference) I apologize for shaking their delicate views.
42 posted on 09/05/2002 6:26:08 AM PDT by Lord_Baltar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson