Skip to comments.
One conspiracy theory goes mainstream.
WSJ ^
Posted on 09/04/2002 10:07:37 PM PDT by fooman
Edited on 04/22/2004 11:47:02 PM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
OKLAHOMA CITY -- With the Sept. 11 anniversary upon us and President Bush talking about a "regime change" in Iraq, it's an apt time to look at two investigators who connect Baghdad to two notorious incidents of domestic terrorism. Jayna Davis, a former television reporter in Oklahoma City, believes an Iraqi cell was involved in the 1995 bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building here. Middle East expert Laurie Mylroie links Iraq to the first bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, and has published a book on the subject.
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Editorial; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: johndoenumber2; okcbombing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
1
posted on
09/04/2002 10:07:37 PM PDT
by
fooman
To: fooman
Well well well. And to think that the Hitler Channel claims the Islamic Mid-Eastern terrorists were not involved in this endeavor
2
posted on
09/04/2002 10:11:51 PM PDT
by
fooman
To: fooman
I am happy to see that the WSJ is picking this up.
I lived and worked only a few blocks away from the Denver courthouse where Judge Matsch presided over the trial.
It was very clear from certain things I observed and read that ever Judge Matsch did not (fully) believe the prosecution's version of events.
3
posted on
09/04/2002 10:33:14 PM PDT
by
ikka
To: ikka
I think that the potus is using the wsj and part of the info campaign. I doubt that the average joe knows about these connections until now.
4
posted on
09/04/2002 10:35:12 PM PDT
by
fooman
To: fooman
The WSJ, to which I subscribe, would have a LOT more credibility had they written this article, say, two years ago. As it is, they ignored most of it until many people were demanding "evidence" of Iraqi misdeeds before committing troops. Until now, they've swallowed the OKC gummit story pretty much hook, line, and sinker.
5
posted on
09/04/2002 10:54:45 PM PDT
by
jammer
To: OKCSubmariner
ping
6
posted on
09/04/2002 10:57:25 PM PDT
by
amom
To: jammer
Yes, but this is furthering the war tom toms
7
posted on
09/04/2002 10:57:50 PM PDT
by
fooman
To: ikka
I am happy to see that the WSJ is picking this up.Sadly, this appears to be published on their op-ed page today, not in any of the news sections. So most people will just roll their eyes and say "Oh, more fruitcake right-wing rantings from The Usual Suspects on the WSJ's editorial page."
8
posted on
09/04/2002 11:00:13 PM PDT
by
Timesink
To: jammer
Exactly my point. The same stories and evidence, had 9/11 not occurred, would not have seen the light of day in the WSJ.
9
posted on
09/04/2002 11:02:01 PM PDT
by
jammer
To: jammer
But 911 DID happen. How long will it take to boomerang back to clinton/reno.
I always was against killing Tim M because dead men dont talk.
He might have given us more info over time
10
posted on
09/04/2002 11:06:59 PM PDT
by
fooman
To: fooman
Yes, I agree with that also. Used to be in the arguments against Fred25 (or whatever) and _Jim, the G-men.
Look, I'm glad things are moving this way. My point is that the WSJ has suspect motives, but the OKC stuff should come out. But another point is that we on the right have our media whores also--and WSJ has been one for the 20 years I have subscribed. You should have read their pathetic defense of Union Carbide when they killed over 3,000 people--more than died at the WTC--at Bhopol (spelling?). Mostly I agree with them, but sometimes they are over the top.
11
posted on
09/04/2002 11:15:37 PM PDT
by
jammer
To: jammer
Notice how the pubbies have kept the debate around sodomy insane.
Dashole did not look happy today at the white house.
12
posted on
09/04/2002 11:19:21 PM PDT
by
fooman
To: honway; Fred Mertz; Uncle Bill; lawdog; archy; backhoe; B4Ranch; Triple; glorygirl; Dixie Mom; ...
FYI
To: fooman
Yeah I saw that History Channel whitewash of Islam today. That muslim woman was bragging that it was "a white male" that bombed OKC. Looks like that white male had a lot of help from the Iraqis.
(And common sense says that the Clinton Administration knows who did it also and kept quiet about it to gain a political advantage over Republicans because of the nutty fringe group McVeigh was a part of can be linked to the right by liars and the sheeple won't know the difference.)
14
posted on
09/04/2002 11:59:28 PM PDT
by
#3Fan
To: fooman
It's nice to know Edward Jay Epstein's thoughts on this matter. Epstein has long been one of the top disinfo experts in Amerika. A pretty good rule of thumb is to disbelieve anything he says. His writings on the JFK assassination are nearly as ridiculous as the writings of the Warren Commission.
To: amom
Thank you for the ping.
To: fooman; jammer
Please see "FBI and DOJ Connivance Permeates,Interconnects Terror Attacks" for more details at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/733759/posts
To: Wm Bach; Donald Stone; ex-Texan; Askel5; STARWISE; Victoria Delsoul; Sabertooth; Leper Messiah; ...
FYI
To: jammer; OKCSubmariner; amom; thinden
5{ credibility had they written this article, say, two years ago.
Mr. Morrison's credibility, however, goes way back. Check out this article of his from '95. Who is David Edwards?
19
posted on
09/05/2002 12:55:42 AM PDT
by
Wallaby
To: OKCSubmariner; *OKCbombing
For some reason I'm reminded of S-F book titles, like "The Sleeper Wakes" and "The Sheep Look Up..."
OKCBOMBING
20
posted on
09/05/2002 1:21:11 AM PDT
by
backhoe
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson