Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ann Coulter Gets Fired...........Again
CentreDaily.com ^ | 3 September 2002

Posted on 09/03/2002 2:28:07 PM PDT by SheLion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-297 next last
To: SheLion
Trust me - many of us don't find the walking stick attractive in the least. We just usually keep our mouths shut, since Coulter devotees around here tend to be "anyone who disagrees with me is an idiot" types.
41 posted on 09/03/2002 2:50:38 PM PDT by truenospinzone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: All
just one little question...DID MISS COULTER TELL THE TRUTH?
42 posted on 09/03/2002 2:53:47 PM PDT by gPal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
In either case, we won't be publishing your Friday column anymore.
We decided not to publish a piece of yours a few weeks back because it was nothing more than a sexual history of some of your enemies -- i.e., private citizens who dared to give money to the Democrats...
More likely, these bozos are referring to THIS column of Ann's, from http://www.anncoulter.org/columns/2002/073102.htm

Working Families From Malibu To East Hampton

July 31, 2002

HAVING DRAGGED A group of Manhattan elites back from the Hamptons last week to attend a fund-raiser at a tony Chelsea night club, Al Gore criticized the Bush administration for "working on behalf of the powerful, and letting the people of this country get the short end of the stick."

Back when he was exhibiting the Democrats' renowned good sportsmanship after he lost the presidential election, Gore managed to fund his tantrum with donations sent in from such ordinary Americans as dot-com multimillionaire Steven Kirsch ($500,000), former Slim-Fast Foods chief S. Daniel Abraham ($100,000) and Minneapolis multimillionaire Vance Opperman ($100,000).

Gore also got some help from the Manhattan "working poor" such as Loews Hotels scion and tobacco company beneficiary Jon Tisch ($50,000) – who must have been on a break from demanding that West African peddlers be thrown off the streets of Manhattan; songwriter and ex-wife of pardoned financier Marc Rich, Denise Rich ($25,000); and investment banker Jon Corzine ($25,000), now representing working families against "the powerful" in the U.S. Senate.

Also warming to Gore's pledge to fight for "working families" were many Hollywood billionaires. Notorious inseminator and Hollywood "producer" Stephen Bing ponied up $200,000. (In Democratic Party parlance, "producer" evidently means "a do-nothing who inherited a lot of money.") Actress and traitor Jane Fonda gave the Gore-Lieberman fund $100,000.

George W. Bush limited donations to his Election Recount Fund to $5,000 or less and still raised $13.8 million – four times more than the $3.2 million collected by Gore. Americans saw what the Democrats were up to, and thousands upon thousands of small contributions poured in to Bush from across the country.

Gore's Tantrum Fund took in $2.1 million from just 38 individuals – or, "working families." He had 84 donations above Bush's $5,000 maximum – totaling about $2.8 million. Of those, 30 were from California and 23 from New York. (Jane Fonda lists her address as Georgia.) Only $56,216 of the Gore-Lieberman fund came from donations of $200 or less. Bush raised more than $3 million in individual donations of $200 or less – more than the entire amount raised by Gore's Tantrum Fund.

The genuine and spontaneous outrage of ordinary Americans against a small band of Democratic royalists was pointedly ignored in news accounts about the recount funds. The Washington Post's headline was: "Bush Far Outspent Gore on Recount." The Chicago Tribune's was: "Bush spent 4 times as much as Gore in Florida recount." The AP headline was: "IRS: Bush spent four times as much as Gore on Florida recount."

The thousands of small donations sent to Bush from average Americans all across the country was said to demonstrate "the powerful fund-raising abilities of the Republican Party" – as The Washington Post obtusely put it.

Meanwhile, back at the Party of the People headquarters, the Democratic National Committee recently took in its largest single donation ever: $5 million from "producer" Stephen Bing – our featured Democrat this week.

In the current Vanity Fair, Bing is described by other Hollywood billionaires as a self-effacing, modest man. As evidence, they note that he has only one maid. "Name anyone else with his wealth who has only one maid," Man of the People Rob Reiner says. "You'd be hard-pressed."

I'd be hard-pressed to think of one of my friends who has a maid. Marie Antoinette did not flaunt her wealth in such a way as "progressive" liberals in America do.

Rich Hollywood progressives raved about how Bing helps out strippers when they're down on their luck. (And, one may surmise, also down on their knees.) "I've helped so many," Bing says, "you'd have to get me the names." That's "self-effacing" for a liberal.

Bing's admiration for the underclass is mainly shown by his predilection for siring children out of wedlock. This seems to be the new status symbol among liberals, with Bing currently leading Jesse Jackson 2-to-1 in disclosed illegitimate children. (Q: How do you empty a room full of rich liberals? A: Ask for a paternity test.)

In a romance borne of progressivism, the mother of one of his illegitimate children, Elizabeth Hurley, crossed a Screen Actors Guild picket line. Bing gallantly paid her fine to the union. So much for the little people.

Also, he plays the blues on the piano. I take it back: He is a man of the people.

Interestingly, Bing doesn't make a fuss about the estate tax. His professional accomplishments amount to having dropped out of Stanford – which we can assume he did not enter on the basis of his SAT scores – and then spending a decade writing a single episode of "Married With Children." Bing's credentials as a producer are as credible as his belief that women are attracted to him for himself.

The current Democratic Party is a crowd of idle, rich degenerates, the likes of which hasn't been seen since the czar's court. When not occupied with abortions or strippers, they busy themselves denouncing the Cossacks as "the powerful."

The bold is mine...
If this is their "sexual history of some of your enemies -- i.e., private citizens who dared to give money to the Democrats" - it is quite a stretch, IMHO

43 posted on 09/03/2002 2:53:56 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TC Rider
Yes. And would probably fall all over themselves getting articles written by Carville and Begala into print.
44 posted on 09/03/2002 2:53:59 PM PDT by rstevens
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12; TC Rider; Hodar; Musket; mrustow; Red Jones; Jim Scott; cynicom; MissBaby; caa26; ...
I can't help notice how every thread about Ann Coulter brings the liberals to it like flies.

I guess she's got their number.


45 posted on 09/03/2002 2:54:11 PM PDT by republicman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Hodar
We don't need no stinkin class.... We have guns :)
46 posted on 09/03/2002 2:55:30 PM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Ann Coulter.....Ann Coulter....Hmmmm - I can't quite place her. Perhaps a picture or two would jog my memory.
47 posted on 09/03/2002 2:55:50 PM PDT by GreenHornet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: republicman
I can't help notice how every thread about Ann Coulter brings the liberals to it like flies.

Actually as with any media figure everyone comes out of the woodwork with their own opinion. See any Rush, Savage etc thread.

Personally, I think Ann's writings okay but she comes off very bitchy. She knows how to play the anger card with the masses. But hey sometimes firebrands are what is needed to galvanize people and I appreciate her doing that.

48 posted on 09/03/2002 2:55:56 PM PDT by amused
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dogbyte12
The reason I like Ann, is not because she is the most intelligent of the conservative columnists, but because we finally have someone who is fighting the liberal columnists head to head. The "viciousness" that Ann displays is simply the same type of name-calling that the liberal press has been doing for years, but that for some reason republicans and conservatives have never really stooped to. Unfortunately, I believe that it is Ann's kind of writing that reaches the masses, not George Will or other more intelligent commentary. Ann is the only columnist who takes on the media head-to-head. We need more conservatives to follow suit. The reason we never seem to win is that we are never really in the fight. Now, we are to some extent, and that is why the liberals hate Ann so much.
49 posted on 09/03/2002 2:56:13 PM PDT by brownie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: republicman
Like I said.... "anyone who ever disagrees with me is an idiot".
50 posted on 09/03/2002 2:57:14 PM PDT by truenospinzone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
This is as we have come to expect from a family of heroin addicts, statutory rapists, convicted and unconvicted female-killers, cheaters, bootleggers and dissolute drunks known as "Camelot." Why would anyone want such people as their "good friends"?

Ann you are mean,mean,mean ...a better sentence would be, "We are doing our best to be good friends with this family of heroin addicts, statutory rapists, convicted and unconvicted female-killers, cheaters, bootleggers and dissolute drunks known as 'Camelot'."

51 posted on 09/03/2002 2:57:26 PM PDT by woofie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Hmmm, I don't get it. But then again I am only a Republican who hates the poor & needy; hates minorities; hates seniors who need prescription drug money; hates kids who need lunch money; hates the whole idea of social security; hates the working class (of which I will always be among); etc., etc., etc. add all the other hate slurs and insinuations the looney left slings my way solely for being a Republican.
52 posted on 09/03/2002 2:57:46 PM PDT by Donna Lee Nardo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet

53 posted on 09/03/2002 2:58:05 PM PDT by TheBigB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Not go nuts... HAVE NUTS.

Can't you ever get that straight?
54 posted on 09/03/2002 2:58:06 PM PDT by Khepera
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: republicman
You hit the nail on the head! The shallow liberals cannot stand Ann's intellect. The fact that Ann articulates her logic so well is what drives them really crazy. Some liberals have just enough brains to be jealous. Makes me smile and chuckle every time they whine about Ann.
55 posted on 09/03/2002 2:58:14 PM PDT by abclily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Utopia
I can only take Ann in small doses.

Amen. She's becoming more and more like a female Pat Buchanan.

56 posted on 09/03/2002 2:58:41 PM PDT by Junior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GreenHornet
Ann Coulter.....Ann Coulter....Hmmmm - I can't quite place her.
Perhaps a picture or two would jog my memory.

57 posted on 09/03/2002 3:00:05 PM PDT by RonDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Junior
What's wrong with Pat Buchanan?
58 posted on 09/03/2002 3:00:17 PM PDT by FreedomFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Utopia
You call my question hate filled? Unbelievable. When you say, only in small doses, it means that you agree, a dose at a time.

If you disagree with Ann, say so. Her style is effective, true and doesn't approach the vile lying of Carville or Begala, who are always given 'prime time'.

Didn't your 'mom' teach you not to associate with 'bad' people. Ann is just following up, you should be grateful.

59 posted on 09/03/2002 3:00:33 PM PDT by duckln
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: SheLion
Two AC threads at a time.

The lady is ruffling all the right feathers.

Pour it on, Annie.

Hit 'em again, harder, harder.
Hit 'em again, harder, harder.
Hit 'em again, harder, harder.

60 posted on 09/03/2002 3:01:06 PM PDT by don-o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-297 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson