Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bureau of Casino Affairs - Heard of the tribe with only eight members? ~ WSJ.
The Wall Street Journal. editorial page | September 3, 2002 | The Wall Street Journal. Editorial Board

Posted on 09/03/2002 3:48:06 AM PDT by Elle Bee

Bureau of Casino Affairs

Heard of the tribe with only eight members?

If your summer vacation included a spot of gambling, chances are you found yourself in Indian country. Chances also are that you didn't encounter many Indians, which is just one of the embarrassments about U.S. Indian affairs that Congress is finally noticing.

Take the $16 million casino that opened this summer on the Augustine Indian Reservation, 130 miles east of Los Angeles. The Augustine Band of Mission Indians has all of eight members. But its new casino, run by a Las Vegas company, has 349 slot machines and 10 card tables.

The Augustine "tribe," if that's the right word, is only one of many to take advantage of the 1988 Indian Gaming Regulatory Act to cash in on casino riches. That law made it easier for federal authorities to recognize tribes, which now means any group with the right combination of Indian blood and political connections to convince the federal Bureau of Indian Affairs. Congress is finally figuring out that this process has become a recipe for political abuse, and the Senate Select Committee on Indian Affairs will hold hearings on tribal recognition this month.

The immediate spur is several controversial BIA decisions this summer. In one case, the bureaucracy upheld a Clinton-era decision granting recognition to the Eastern Pequot and Paucatuck of Connecticut, even though BIA historians had shown they didn't qualify. This no doubt pleases one Paucatuck backer, that noted defender of Native American values Donald Trump, who is waiting to build another gambling palace. Also glowing is GOP lobbyist Ronald Kaufman, who was paid $500,000 to lobby for the Eastern Pequot.

The BIA showed more backbone in a second case, stripping the Chinook and Duwamish Indians in Washington state of "tribal" status they'd been granted in Bill Clinton's final days (the Indian version of Presidential pardons). The Chinook Indians own less than an acre of land today, and only a few hundred people now claim to be Duwamish.

Both the Connecticut and Washington decisions were issued by top Clinton officials who now work as lawyers for firms representing Indian casino interests. Earlier this year the Interior Department's Inspector General called the circumstances surrounding those decisions "highly unusual," which is putting it mildly.

But the problem is much bigger than tribal recognition. Federal handling of Indian affairs has been a disgrace for generations, and casinos have been a perhaps understandable response. A group of Indian leaders recently explained to us that casinos have brought a degree of pride and economic self-sufficiency to some tribes, contributing to the building of roads, schools, museums and health-care clinics.

On the other hand, the benefits aren't all that widespread. The latest Census figures show that most Native Americans remain mired in poverty, and other studies suggest little progress in raising education and health standards. The impact of gambling on the social fabric, including the dangers posed by organized crime, is another concern. Our own reporting has shown the powerful influence of politics and non-Indian developers on tribal recognition and casino deals. These concerns are shared by many Indian leaders, such as those in the Navajo Nation, the largest American Indian tribe, which has resisted the lure of gambling on its lands.

The irony is that the stronger casino interests become politically, spreading their dollars around Congress and statehouses, the more they're able to stop any serious look at these broader Indian issues. Virginia Representative Frank Wolf recently proposed a study on the state of the American Indian in the 21st century, casinos included. His idea was killed by pro-casino Members who feared an anti-gambling motive. But gambling and tribal recognition were only part of a much larger inspection that Mr. Wolf wants undertaken, including health, economic and education standards in Indian country.

Federal policy toward the Indian community has long been a failed exercise in social engineering. Indian casinos don't strike us a miracle solution, except for the gambling interests who'll get rich. Mr. Wolf's proposed survey would provide the basis for an informed national debate.

Updated September 3, 2002

.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: clintonlegacy; indiancasinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last
Big Chief Pataki ~ WSJ.

.

July 18, 2001 More Micah Morrison:

El Dorado at Last: The Casino Boom - Did Clinton cronies cash in on Indian gambling? ~ Micah Morrison

.

Casino Royale: The Foxwoods Story - The casino isn't as wholesome as you think ~ Micah Morrison -WSJ

.

1 posted on 09/03/2002 3:48:06 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
This thing reeks of sour grapes, sounds like you're connected to the non-Indian gaming industry, or could it be you’re just another caring soul (read nanny) who knows best how other people should live their lives?
2 posted on 09/03/2002 4:00:38 AM PDT by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
Nope ..... I'm a proud member of the Fugowe Nation

as they said on F Troup..... We're the Fugowe and where are we goin'?

.

3 posted on 09/03/2002 4:28:25 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
TightSqueeze signed up 2000-02-09.

Location: Riverview

.

4 posted on 09/03/2002 4:33:45 AM PDT by Elle Bee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
Elle Bee signed up 1999-02-20.

Location: Who gives a rats ass!
5 posted on 09/03/2002 5:08:03 AM PDT by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
While I don't agree with casinos in principle, and I know that the "tribe" in connecticut is a joke, I'm still trying to figure out what gives the BIA the right to tell us who is, and who isn't an American Indian... We are the only race that is required to have an official gov't ID card that says we are, and how much indian blood we have... quite frankly it's bullcrap - I sent my card back to the BIA a long time ago and told them to kiss my rosy red butt...
6 posted on 09/03/2002 5:28:10 AM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
You got all that from #1?
7 posted on 09/03/2002 5:51:15 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
Pure speculation on my part, Medicine Man in training.
8 posted on 09/03/2002 5:54:55 AM PDT by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze; Elle Bee
Considering the Bruce Babbit debacle, the BOIA cash-for-influence scandals of the Clinton years and the fact that these people operate as a separate nation within our borders, I think it's fair to examine their motives and connections.

And if you think about it, Indian gaming and the relative insularity of the reservations is a prime opportunity for an organization like al-Queda.

And TS, I'll spare you the trouble: IncPen signed up 1997-12-03

9 posted on 09/03/2002 6:00:42 AM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
The "Rez" near where I grew up is kind of a joke... you can drive through and see more afro headed and blonde haired blued eyed Indians than the regulation kind...and the Casinos staffed mostly by local whites and Nevada types...
I think you only have to be 1/6th "Native" to get an official tribal card..thought I am not sure what the conditions are to start getting your check.
10 posted on 09/03/2002 6:05:45 AM PDT by joesnuffy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
Indian gaming and the relative insularity of the reservations is a prime opportunity for an organization like al-Queda.

Ain't nothing like a good witch-hunt, hell, one can't be too safe now-a-days, sure thay could be terrorists, we are talking about the future of America here, not on my watch. Yeah, yeah I get it now its for the children.

11 posted on 09/03/2002 6:15:00 AM PDT by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee; stand watie
Federal handling of Indian affairs has been a disgrace for generations, and casinos have been a perhaps understandable response.

The feds and the BIA have terminally mucked up Indian affairs for 150 years.

12 posted on 09/03/2002 6:21:34 AM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
Ain't nothing like a good witch-hunt, hell, one can't be too safe now-a-days, sure thay could be terrorists, we are talking about the future of America here, not on my watch. Yeah, yeah I get it now its for the children.

Great attitude.

I suggest you shimmy over to your local Community College and sign up for the Arabic language classes.

Maybe you noticed, about a year ago, 3,000 people died.

Of course, that was a one-time thing, it couldn't happen again because they made their point, and they're not going to bother us anymore or look for weakness within our borders.

Thanks, TS, I'll protect my children with something more than hand-wringing liberal guilt and a fear of insulting someone's pride .

13 posted on 09/03/2002 6:36:09 AM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
And if you think about it, Indian gaming and the relative insularity of the reservations is a prime opportunity for an organization like al-Queda.

The tribes that have adopted gambling are probably the least likely to embrace any terrorist organization. Instead they are embracing capitalism and the great pursuit of the all mighty dollar. What could be more American? Instead of looking at the tribes that are on the move maybe you should look at the tribes that are going nowhere, for evidence of harboring your malcontents, subversives and terrorists.

14 posted on 09/03/2002 7:00:58 AM PDT by Between the Lines
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Elle Bee
Early Americans were against scalping, but today the public is begging for it.
15 posted on 09/03/2002 7:13:57 AM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IncPen
I suggest you shimmy over...

Why don't you come right over and nudge me a bit, that is if you think are man, or fool enough.

16 posted on 09/03/2002 7:22:41 AM PDT by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Between the Lines
Instead of looking at the tribes that are on the move maybe you should look at the tribes that are going nowhere, for evidence of harboring your malcontents, subversives and terrorists.

Like I said, since they are separate nations within our borders, they bear scrutiny. All of them.

17 posted on 09/03/2002 7:26:12 AM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
Why don't you come right over and nudge me a bit, that is if you think are man, or fool enough.

Goodness, I don't think I've ever been 'called out' on the FR before...

Because you can't beat me with an argument you want fisticuffs? How desperately manly! of you.

Oh goodness.

Bwa hahahahahahha!

I'm going to bookmark this one!

I'm gonna send it to my friends, too!

Bwa hahahahahahha!

18 posted on 09/03/2002 7:30:22 AM PDT by IncPen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: TightSqueeze
LOL. Let me know if you come up with a cure for a hang-over.
19 posted on 09/03/2002 11:35:10 AM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 1rudeboy
What's the use of getting sober
When you're gonna get drunk again
Oh Sam done something fine
When he bought that good whiskey, beer and wine
I love my whiskey and I love my gin
Every time you see me I'm in my sin
So what's the use of getting sober
When you're gonna get drunk again -- Joe Jackson
20 posted on 09/03/2002 1:32:25 PM PDT by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson