Posted on 09/02/2002 10:14:59 AM PDT by mikeb704
She gets to do what she loves (shop) and she only works her own hours. That's decent money for working part-time in low-cost Alabama.
Another acqaintence of mine offers photographic touch-up services. He's got a web page and occassionaly takes out an ad in a Green Sheet or small local paper when he wants extra business, and mostly he gets people with faded old photographs or pictures of babies with "red eyes" that he scans in to PhotoShop and digitally touches up. He makes decent money, works from home, and didn't have to interview with anyone younger than himself.
What you are witnessing in your job search is that it is becoming increasingly harder to get a steady paycheck from an employer (especially when said employer would have to put up with your admitted idiosyncracies, per above).
But why do you want a paycheck? Wouldn't checks for your goods via eBay/Paypal suffice? Wouldn't checks for your photographic touch-up services be good enough? Wouldn't you rather work at home, anyway?
You already said that you like to surf the Net and keep your own hours, so go forth and do what you enjoy.
I hate job hunting but my employer has me down to 20 hours every other week and I'm getting desperate though I'm not quite ready for "Do you want fries with that?"
That is, I tend to favor older applicants over younger applicants. Over the years, the "older" employees have consistently worked out better. They are more dependable, more hard working, easier to get along with, and tend to be "low-maintenance" employees that can be depended upon to do their jobs well. As well, they usually have excellent customer relations.
Younger applicants, especially those new to the workforce, are oftentimes "high-maintenance" employees. They tend to complain, complain, complain. They must constantly be supervised. They tend to call in sick or arrive late much more frequently then their older counterparts. They often have an "attitude" and generate the most customer complains for rudeness. They are rarely happy employees and often they seed discontent with the other workers.
Generally speaking of course. There are exceptions to the rule. I have developed some excellent young employees over the years and as well, I have hired in some older people who just didn't work out.
But if I have two applicants and one is older (40ish) and the other is younger (20ish), I will tend to go with the older one most of the time.
Anyway, please forgive me for practicing age discrimination. And please don't report me to the authorities. Happy Labor Day!
Job-hunting is the worst. Right now it isnt even easy for us young ones with collage degrees in business and excellent references. It took me three months to find a job at both a lower position and lower wage then the job I was downsized from. Of course I was looking for a career not just a job ;^)
If you just want a job you should try a Temporary Agency. You get to meet new and interesting people whos lungs you would like to rip out for wages that McDonald's would scorn to offer but it is not boring.
In fact the constant change can be kind of fun. And there is always the chance that you will find someplace that likes you enough to offer a permanent job and you will like them enough to accept.
a.cricket
Maybe it depends on the job but I think age discrimination tends to be in that direction in many cases. Older can be better because for one you can check more references and the job history is better.
I think that a lot of businesses have checklists that they use for hiring new employees. Your qualifications and interview are secondary considerations.
I quit my "career" on June 1, after 35 years of fighting the Los Angeles freeways (etc., etc., etc.) and moved wifey and self to what had been our weekend home out here in the south eastern Kalifornia desert. We did fine on the sale of the L.A. area home, so there is no immediate pressure.
All this said, I've begun dipping my foot into the job search waters, and have my first real "interview" tomorrow. I'm 55; will report back here if I pick up any "code" for 'age discrimination'!
I got my current job by doing a brute-force, white-pages telephone search. In other words, I went through the white pages (that way I knew I'd hit every possible number because small companies don't have to pay to be listed there) and called every company that looked like it might have anything to do with technology.
I made 165 calls before I got hired; that was 13 years ago.
And I own the company now.
(steely)
The Authorities shouldn't be a problem ... but if you work for a large corporation, you might want to be aware of the corporation's preferences - usually the younger, the better. Youngsters might be "high maintenance" but that would be someone else's problem - they work cheap, and they lower the "average employee age" which is important to the health insurance carriers.
But I certainly applaud your efforts, Sam.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.