Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JohnHuang2
"There is an emerging consensus among leading scholars," said the West Virginia Democrat and ranking member of the Armed Services Committee, "that the 1991 use of force resolution ceased to be effective once Iraq capitulated to U.S. and allied forces in April 1991." (Actually, the resolution said nothing of the kind, but let's leave it at that.)

"Leading scholars"...hmmm, let's see - they aren't elected officials, so, why should we listen to them? Besides, while the claim of "that the 1991 use of force resolution ceased to be effective once Iraq capitulated to U.S. and allied forces in April 1991." might or might not be proven true (I'd argue for the latter), if they are "Leading scholars," as purported, they should also have the wisdom to look at other Congressional resolutions, mainly, the one passed on September 14, 2001, giving the President authority to prosecute the new war. If they are true scholars, they should know the basic persuasive principles of primacy and recency.

Democrats have no one to blame but themselves, and, the more they cry out against a war, the more cowardly they appear, and the more emboldened Saddam, with or without nukes, becomes.

5 posted on 09/01/2002 11:29:29 AM PDT by NorCoGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: NorCoGOP
Democrats have no one to blame but themselves, and, the more they cry out against a war, the more cowardly they appear, and the more emboldened Saddam, with or without nukes, becomes

Bull's-eye.

8 posted on 09/01/2002 1:00:33 PM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson