Skip to comments.
Microsoft's Newest Challenger: Moore's Law
Business 2.0 ^
| 28 August 2002
| Eric Hellweg
Posted on 08/30/2002 9:58:01 AM PDT by ShadowAce
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: rdb3
Outside of that, I haven't really studied up on the .NET business strategy.... Guess I'll do that now.Do let us know your conclusions and the links you used.. tia..
To: Malcolm
Hey, Dennis! Where is the Start button on Lindows? Thx, Malcolm
________________
Your Lindows desktop is your start button :)
22
posted on
08/30/2002 11:03:05 AM PDT
by
dennisw
To: dennisw
Also the reason for their absurd DOTnet stuff. What business in their right mind wants their data and applications sitting somewhere in info-space on a Micro$haft server?
Dennis, it's pretty obvious to anyone who's worked with the .NET Framework that you simply don't know what you're talking about. You might want to actually try reading the documentation and writing some code for .NET before you arrive at such bogus conclusions. .NET -- the software developer entity -- is merely an application compiler and framework. It is essentially analogous to Sun's J2EE framework; so, it is wholly independent of Microsoft online services such as MSN and Passport. Microsoft isn't forcing customers to put their data and applications on its own servers. You simply pulled that out of your ass.
What's confusing you is that MS has been branding nearly all of its software and services with .NET as a marketing label when, in fact, few of them have anything to do with the .NET application framework. The MS marketers jumped the gun on this one, in my opinion. But people (like you) who have leaped to the conclusion that .NET = MS software rental are simply full of shit.
23
posted on
08/30/2002 11:14:58 AM PDT
by
Bush2000
Comment #24 Removed by Moderator
To: ShadowAce
Yeah, BUT:
MS is now almost to the point of being "COBOL." There's such an investment in the stuff that to abandon it might cost MORE than to maintain.
Of course, MS has to make it 'cheap to maintain' for the installed base to remain loyal and inertia-fat.
25
posted on
08/30/2002 12:36:45 PM PDT
by
ninenot
To: Bush2000
But people (like you) who have leaped to the conclusion that .NET = MS software rental are simply full of shit.Oh, come on now. Why don't you tell 'im what you really think?
To: ShadowAce
Last time I looked, Office XP was on sale at Office Max and Target for $150. True it says "Academic Version", but who's kidding whom? When it's on the retail shelves, that's the price.
27
posted on
08/30/2002 12:47:39 PM PDT
by
js1138
To: Bush2000
...and there can be legitimate business reasons for warehousing data on another server, secured...
28
posted on
08/30/2002 12:50:54 PM PDT
by
ninenot
To: ShadowAce
In 1995, I bought 'PerfectWorks" by Novell for $40 at a hole-in-the-wall computer shop. Even though I'm using MS Office, I still go back to PerfectWorks because of all the neat templates and financial programs which came with it. However, it's compatible only with itself. But still an exceptional value and still useable after all these years.
To: js1138
Last time I looked, Office XP was on sale at Office Max and Target for $150. True it says "Academic Version", but who's kidding whom? When it's on the retail shelves, that's the price.Better have your academic ID ready. If they catch you trying to pull a fast one you'd probably get arrested and prosecuted for that. Everywhere around here requires that you show an academic ID of some kind. If nothing more that means you get your k-12 neighbor to buy it for you for $20+retail cost (can you say easy money for school kids?!)...
So the moral of the story is...... get someone to buy it for you. The store really won't care. $140 in revenue for an academic version is a whole hell of a lot better than $0. (Microsoft usually ships academic versions at cost-of-production-and-shipping to these stores).
30
posted on
08/30/2002 1:45:07 PM PDT
by
dheretic
To: dennisw
are you using Lindows?
I'm interested in hearing how it performs with MS software ...
31
posted on
08/30/2002 3:07:04 PM PDT
by
fnord
To: ninenot
My old company was big into that. Our customer base was schools, it's well known in the school "biz" that schools are run by C students (exactly the type of people willing to take a 30% cut in pay in exchange for great job security). The sell was pretty easy: who do you want in charge of your backups, people who can find and keep work in the private sector or peole that can't?
32
posted on
08/30/2002 3:15:49 PM PDT
by
discostu
To: dennisw
33
posted on
08/30/2002 3:19:14 PM PDT
by
Utopia
To: CWRWinger
You can still get that deal now. You can get WP9 (one or two versions back), Quattro Pro, and graphics packages for some $50. These are good programs and just as capable as anything in MS Office. The menus may be a bit different, but the capabilities are about equal.
34
posted on
08/31/2002 11:58:12 AM PDT
by
gore3000
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson