Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Momaw Nadon
Its not fair, because I have already been told its FEBRUARY 3, 2003 (ground forces).
30 posted on 08/30/2002 8:52:57 AM PDT by babble-on
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: babble-on
Just to clarify, the date and time of the massive initial attack is what we are talking about.
31 posted on 08/30/2002 8:55:49 AM PDT by Momaw Nadon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: babble-on
Hey, that's my birthday! It would be a nice present! Though I'd much prefer we go in sooner than later.
36 posted on 08/30/2002 8:59:14 AM PDT by TrappedInLiberalHell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: babble-on
First week of February, or first week of March. We'll want as little moonlight/starlight as possible, to maximize the advantage of US night vision and thermal viewing equipment. There are also considerations relating to tides in the region affecting offloading of shipborne supply movements.

I'll say 05 February, at around 0430 Baghdad time.

-archy-/-

429 posted on 12/13/2002 9:46:28 AM PST by archy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson