To: JMJ333
here we go ... you're trying to defend Mary as the "mother of God"?
53 posted on
08/27/2002 8:18:48 PM PDT by
Bobby777
To: Bobby777
I put up a link on Mary because I think John Newman explains it far better than I can.
My question to you, rather, was "How do you know the rightly inspired books are in the NT since you reject the authority of Rome who put together and approved of said scripture?"
65 posted on
08/27/2002 8:24:43 PM PDT by
JMJ333
To: Bobby777
defend Mary as the "mother of God"? Nothing to defend. She IS the Mother of God the Son, Jesus Christ.
To: Bobby777; JMJ333
Hey guys. Let's not go there. This discussion is not about Mary. Start up a separate thread and have at it till 2 AM.
88 posted on
08/27/2002 8:41:30 PM PDT by
Barnacle
To: Bobby777
Wait a minute, why must you assume someone else is wrong, simply because you yourself don't believe it? Whatever happened to having a little respect for others who come from another tradition? Maybe not every Christian looks at the Bible the same way you do!
138 posted on
08/27/2002 9:46:48 PM PDT by
dsutah
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson