Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LexBaird
By your reasoning one could never have communication, because one's interpretation of any communication would be based on "speculation" of the true meaning.

The problem is,,,I never asked you, or anyone else, what the poster meant. I asked HIM. He chose not to answer. Oh well.

I don't really care what YOU think HE meant. Or I would have asked you.

127 posted on 08/27/2002 9:15:58 AM PDT by Protagoras
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies ]


To: ThomasJefferson
The problem is,,,I never asked you, or anyone else, what the poster meant. I asked HIM. He chose not to answer. Oh well.

I don't really care what YOU think HE meant. Or I would have asked you.

Then you should have used the nifty little button marked "private reply" instead of posting to the entire list.

I "speculate" the original poster hasn't replied because he feels his views are manifest in his first post. I certainly found them so, but you evidently find them obscure enough to assume he was advocating theft. Or do I again err in my assumptions?

129 posted on 08/27/2002 10:04:13 AM PDT by LexBaird
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson