How Court Cited Clinton-Era Abuses Suppressed by Networks (NBC goes blank when Clinton named)

Media Research Center ^ | August 26, 2002 | Brent Baker

[Mr. Mulliner]

How strange is that to have their broadcast blank out just when Clinton in about to be impugned?

For what it's worth, the next story from today's MRC Cyberalert is also on this topic:

Washington Post Scolded Ashcroft, Ignored Clinton

[DoughtyOne]

I have nothing but contempt for our nation's media. They could take down Nixon, but couldn't pursue all the facets of the Lewinsky scandle. Imaging a UN Ambassador dropping everything else to find a job for a WH intern. Folks, the media is beyond hope. It wants to end your way of life.

[Oldeconomybuyer]

The official DNC spin is to always say the 75 incidents were the fault of the FBI head Louis Freeh (sp) never mentioning the names Reno or Clinton.

[harpseal]

So the court confirmed the Clinton era justice department abused this process and since the primary focus of the Clinton era justice department was pursuing political opponents of the rapist, traitor it would be fair to conclude that this process was used against the political opponents of the Clinton adminmistration. Clearly every member of that administration involved in this should be in prison for the rest of their lives.

Stay well - Stay safe - Stay armed - Yorktown

[texasbluebell]

I have nothing but contempt for our nation's media.

And they have nothing but contempt for us.

[Dark Wing]

ping

[SteveH]

Here is the Real Player link:

NBC Clinton Video Censorship Real Player segment

It is frightening.

(Suggestion to moderators/webmasters: perhaps there is a way to make the form of redirect link content rewrite an option prior to posting.)

[Mr. Mulliner]

Thanks for posting that link. It is frightening...and very damning, in my opinioin.

[B4Ranch]

Clearly every member of that administration involved in this should be in prison for the rest of their lives.

Why does Bush have to keep the agency administrators? To satisfy the UN or the Democrats?

[DoughtyOne]

So true.

[taxcontrol]

Thank you very much! I once again see the value of FreeRepublic because I have not heard this side of the story. Though I have never trusted the major news networks, I was begining to doubt the DOJ.

[Mr. Mulliner]

You know, there are plenty of freepers here who are just as ready as the media to hang the DOJ for their efforts to catch the terrorists. I wish they would stop and think about the sources of their information if they hear about this story. It's too easy, once you've got it in for someone to believe every bad report about them. In this case, this is the media's bread and butter.

[lavaroise]

Is it somekind of conspiracy by the media? (sarcasm)

[Mr. Mulliner]

Maybe my tin-foil hat is too tight, but the fact that the one thing that would impugn Clinton gets deleted is too much coincidence for me.

[Dante3]

BUMP

[JessicaDragonet]

The networks and the print media have opted to present "docu-dramas" rather than facts. They use 1% truth and mix it with 99% fiction...then call it journalism. Unforgivable.

[Prodigal Son]

Bump for later reading.

[bandleader]

Not "A UN Ambassador" but OURS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[Steve_Seattle]

This is amazing. The article in the Seattle Times made it sound like the 75 cases occurred during the Bush administration. There was not the slightest hint that these cases occurred during the Clinton years.

[Mr. Mulliner]

Is this the article you're referring to?

Secret court rebukes feds on spy powers