Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sabertooth
According to the Adjudication Officers here in the Phoenix district, that I have talked too, about 60% off this districts 245(i) applicants are foreign-born spouses.

The problem is, the majority of those got married within the time that the 245(i) extension was announced, so it is highly likely that the majority of those applications are marriage fraud. That’s why, in my proposal, the applicant has to have been married for 5 years, to cut down on possible marriage fraud.

615 posted on 08/24/2002 8:27:45 AM PDT by Marine Inspector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 608 | View Replies ]


To: Marine Inspector
According to the Adjudication Officers here in the Phoenix district, that I have talked too, about 60% off this districts 245(i) applicants are foreign-born spouses.

Is that an off-the-cuff, ballpark figure, or a hard number?

Of the remainder, some will be siblings or children. How many Section 245(i) Amnesties were granted to Illegals sponsored by employers?



629 posted on 08/24/2002 9:43:25 AM PDT by Sabertooth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 615 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson