Replies

DW owned the RV, used it that weekend Danielle went missing, Then why wasn't a scent of Danielle, alive or dead, found in the RV? Why was there just one print? If she was not bound (there was no evidence of bruising on her body) how did he restrain her? If he killer her there how come their was no evidence of her death?

And if you had the body of a dead girl in your motor home would you go to sites where you would meet friends and be expected to entertain?

The logic of those who wish to convict does not pass the 'smell' test. As many have said before, the only ones that do not have a 'dog' in this fight are the dogs and the bugs, and they voted not guilty.

Then why wasn't a scent of Danielle, alive or dead, found in the RV? Why was there just one print?

I'll say it again, slowly this time...B L E A C H...

If she was not bound (there was no evidence of bruising on her body) how did he restrain her?

Please explain to this humble nurse the signficance that bruising was not evident on a mummified body with much flesh missing?

And if you had the body of a dead girl in your motor home would you go to sites where you would meet friends and be expected to entertain?

I would never try to presume the actions of a ruthless killer--however, to entertain you--what "friends" did he meet and entertain during his meandering through the desert anyway?