Replies

Then why wasn't a scent of Danielle, alive or dead, found in the RV? Why was there just one print?

I'll say it again, slowly this time...B L E A C H...

If she was not bound (there was no evidence of bruising on her body) how did he restrain her?

Please explain to this humble nurse the signficance that bruising was not evident on a mummified body with much flesh missing?

And if you had the body of a dead girl in your motor home would you go to sites where you would meet friends and be expected to entertain?

I would never try to presume the actions of a ruthless killer--however, to entertain you--what "friends" did he meet and entertain during his meandering through the desert anyway?

I'll say it again, slowly this time...B L E A C H...

Again you show your knowledge of the media over the evidence presented at trial. The only bleach present was in Westerfield's washing machine, not his motor home. Your dismissal of evidence does now 'wash'. There was no evidence of 'bleach' in the motor home.

Please explain to this humble nurse the signficance that bruising was not evident on a mummified body with much flesh missing?

Once again you must read what the ME testified to instead of what you have heard on the boob tube. The ME said that there was NO evidence of bruising on her wrists or the ankle that remained, and that there was suffieient flesh that remained to make such a determination......

But please keep askin questions, for in your asking you may find the need to find the truth.....the truth that lies beyond the screen and lays in the real world.