[Valpal1]

The jury saw the porn, all of it, and made their own conclusions. GUILTY, GUILTY, GUILTY.

They had access to the directory printouts, how much of what, where, etc. GUILTY.

bvw, he was convicted of possession of material depicting minors engaged in sexual activity. I guess the child porn really was porn, too bad.

[bvw]

What can I say. They did see it, they did make that judgement. I have not, you have not -- we've heard echoes of what it was, but that is all. Still, it was prejudicial without the expert testiomny or established pattern to make it substantial.

Did they hang a man for looking at nasty pictures?

The noose was supposedly reserved for dread murderers.

[OldFriend]

I believe the material depicted minors engaged in VIOLENT sexual activity.