To: Valpal1
What can I say. They did see it, they did make that judgement. I have not, you have not -- we've heard echoes of what it was, but that is all. Still, it was prejudicial without the expert testiomny or established pattern to make it substantial.
Did they hang a man for looking at nasty pictures?
The noose was supposedly reserved for dread murderers.
619 posted on
08/21/2002 2:29:21 PM PDT by
bvw
To: bvw
Geez, you are maudlin, penalty phase doesn't start till next week.
If he gets the DP, it will be for the murder of Danielle Van Dam, not dirty pictures.
He'll die of heart/circulatory disease before the appeals are over. He'll have a comfy 15 years on death row, protected from Bubba in general population, get himself a jailhouse degree in law and even another patent or two maybe.
Probably won't have access to any children ever again though.
632 posted on
08/21/2002 2:51:14 PM PDT by
Valpal1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson