[ItsOurTimeNow]

I'm with you Henrietta.

No one proved how Danielle died
No one proved how DW killed her
No one proved how DW got her out of her house
No one proved how DW disposed of her body
No one proved DW is a pervert
Not one shred of evidence of DW being in the Van Dam house
Unidentified fingerprints were never sourced
Fibers were never sourced
Fibers were never dated
The scent dogs never "hit" DW being in the VD house
The scent dogs never "hit" Danielle being in the motorhome

yet, despite all this...the jury is going to send a man to his death.

[Coop]

the jury is going to send a man to his death.

A jury that took a long, hard look at more evidence than you or I dug up on FR or elsewhere on the 'Net.

[Coop]

the jury is going to send a man to his death.

A jury that took a long, hard look at more evidence than you or I dug up on FR or elsewhere on the 'Net.

[Congressman Billybob]

The scent dogs are supposed to respond only to a DEAD body, not to live people being there (motorhome or wherever). Remember that Westerfield in talking with the police before he was charged and arrested, referred to "we" in describing the motor home trip to the desert, yet he was supposedly alone on that trip.

If he had Danielle in the motor home at that point, but she was still alive and wimpering into her mouth gag, and he only killed her when it was time to "dispose of evidence and witnesses," then the dogs should not have responded to the motor home.

The jury's guilty verdict makes sense on the facts. The protestors on this thread who say "an innocent man was railroaded," do not make sense.

Congressman Billybob

[Irene Adler]

Judge Napolitano, who comments on legal issues for FOX News said he found the evidence against Westerfield "overwhelming". I heard him say that this afternoon when he was discussing the guilty verdict in this case.

He's sat through a lot of cases while on the bench. Why would he say that if the evidence was so poor? His comments always seem so sensible, and he seems to have a good head on his shoulders along with his experience. I have found his comments to be both reasonable and persuasive on FOX News all along. Why would he be so far off on this one?