Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

"The film Black Hawk Down is helping to create a new myth of American nationhood." -UK Newspaper
Published in the Guardian 29th January 2002 ^ | Published in the Guardian 29th January 2002 | By George Monbiot

Posted on 08/20/2002 4:04:43 PM PDT by vannrox

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last
Another bout of crap from our friends in the UK.
1 posted on 08/20/2002 4:04:43 PM PDT by vannrox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Abuse! Where is the super-barf alert? You should be banned for leaving it out!

This guy is just making sh!t up!!!

2 posted on 08/20/2002 4:07:58 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
Actually, this critique raises some very legitimate points.
3 posted on 08/20/2002 4:11:33 PM PDT by IGOTMINE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Talk about projection psychosis. These British newsies have way too much time on there hands. And it is clear that the owners of these papers have no sense of integrity or expectation of retaining credibility. Look for these papers to be offered up for sale soon.
4 posted on 08/20/2002 4:13:22 PM PDT by anymouse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Four paragraphs into this piece of drival the author states "George Bush senior announced that America had come to do "God's work". Notice how never any any further reading do you see the name of Bill Clinton mentioned. This piece of crap is so slanted that it tries to push the blame for the deaths of 19 fine American servicemen onto to Pres. Bush Sr. Drival. Pure unabashed hogswill.
5 posted on 08/20/2002 4:15:10 PM PDT by sharkdiver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox; leadpenny
FYI background info for those that may be interested.
6 posted on 08/20/2002 4:15:36 PM PDT by VaMarVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE
Actually, this critique raises some very legitimate points.

Why don't you tell us which points you think are legimate. Then the points can (hopefully) be discussed without this thread simply turning into a name-calling exercise against the author of the piece.

7 posted on 08/20/2002 4:16:41 PM PDT by oremites
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: IGOTMINE
Sure, I agree, but his most important points are factual fabrications. Of course we were stupid to back warlords, take sides, etc in what was meant to be a humanitarian mission. But his recounting of the actual events contradicts everything I've ever seen published anywhere. Is he the only correct person in the world, or is he a tin-foil-wearing crackpot? I think the latter.
8 posted on 08/20/2002 4:17:12 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
What do you get if you insert id between Monb and iot?
9 posted on 08/20/2002 4:19:13 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
The title you posted (assumed a quote from the Guardian) presume the US is painting itself as a victim of foreign evil. The actual article implies but does not state the same premise with regard to the incident.

Both assumptions are false.

Most Americans do honestly believe that the circumstances portrayed in Blackhawk Down did victimize us ... but we were victimized by Bill Clinton, not a foreign power.

10 posted on 08/20/2002 4:20:43 PM PDT by Amerigomag
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
"...the belief that you can bomb a nation into peace and prosperity."

Japan and Germany come to mind. The movie also told of a famine because in the begining of the film you see warlords shooting people to get away from UN food drops. Why else would there be food drops?? hmmm??

"...even the crucial role played by Malaysian soldiers in the Rangers' rescue, have been excised from the record."

At the end of the film, it showed UN troops coming in and saving our special forces too.

11 posted on 08/20/2002 4:21:31 PM PDT by rudypoot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: vannrox
Just who is this freakish Brit presstitute? "Black Hawk Down" was a great movie about a disgraceful military incident that traitor Bill Clinton was  responsible for. Best lesson is to not put US troops into situations where they are hobbled with the wrong equipment and inadequate firepower because of politically correct orders from above. From Les Aspin and Bill Clinton. 

Lives of US soldiers are cheap to the Demon-crats

13 posted on 08/20/2002 4:22:45 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
the belief that you can bomb a nation into peace and prosperity.

When did we bomb Somalia?

Although, you CAN bomb a nation into peace and prosperity if you hit the right people.

14 posted on 08/20/2002 4:32:22 PM PDT by TomB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Amerigomag
I'm sure that the author, to this day, has a poster of Bill Clinton hanging on his bedroom wall.

"A terrible mistake was made that resulted in the loss of life on all sides," said Dellums, concluding that military force instead of diplomacy was used to settle a political problem. Rather than maintain a neutral peacekeeping role for a famine-relief effort implemented by Bush, Clinton became enmeshed in urban combat.

15 posted on 08/20/2002 4:35:27 PM PDT by Madame Dufarge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: oremites
He can't! Because there ain't none!
16 posted on 08/20/2002 4:38:22 PM PDT by old school
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TomB
the belief that you can bomb a nation into peace and prosperity.

The best thing that can happen to country that makes war on us is to lose: Germany, Japan. Russia and Eastern Europe, perhaps.

The worst, is to win: Viet Nam, or to come to a draw: North Korea, Cuba, Iraq.

17 posted on 08/20/2002 4:42:33 PM PDT by dinasour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
It had failed to recognise that the competing clan chiefs were ready to accept largescale disarmament, if it were carried out impartially.

You should have posted this under humor.

18 posted on 08/20/2002 4:42:51 PM PDT by GOV'T MULE
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Amazing, the article drags President Bush, Sr. into the mess but conveniently overlooks the fact that in 1993, Clinton and Aspin took over the helm but refused our men the tools they needed to be effective: armored personnel carriers and gunships.
19 posted on 08/20/2002 4:46:24 PM PDT by Procyon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: vannrox
Man this guy really is bitter...

mail@monbiot.com

20 posted on 08/20/2002 4:47:59 PM PDT by VaBthang4
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-36 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson