Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

But the tax doesn't cover rolling tobacco. And a carton's worth of cigarettes can be rolled for about $15 — less than half the price of factory-rolled smokes.

Davis is part of a trend the market is noticing.

''We're bringing back old stuff that's never sold before,'' said Mike Cramsey, a buyer for T & B Cramsey Wholesale, a tobacco shop in Allentown. He said the store has seen a big increase in sales of rolling tobacco and related products, such as rolling machines and papers that until recently he couldn't get rid of.

He's not alone.

''It took us all by surprise,'' said Jan Morgan, Tobacco Category manager for Uni-Mart Corp., which owns more than 50 Choice Cigarette Discount Outlet stores in Pennsylvania. Rolling-tobacco sales have tripled for the stores.

''We can't keep it in stock,'' said Dennis Zehner Sr., an employee at Tobacco and Cigar Connoisseurs in Allentown, where sales of rolling tobacco have gone up threefold. ''We get a shipment in one day, and the next day it's gone.''

Republic Tobacco, maker of the popular Drum and Top brands of tobacco, has expanded production facilities because of new demand brought about by increased taxes in 17 states this year, said Warren Schoening, the company's national sales manager.

Internet tobacco sales have skyrocketed alongside states' cigarette taxes. Smokers can easily find a carton of Marlboro going for less than $32 online — that's 25 percent less than traditional sales.

The price includes shipping. In most cases, Web sites can offer such low prices because, unlike other retailers, they don't have to collect taxes.

When buying cartons through the Internet, people are supposed to pay the taxes directly to the state.

To make sure that happens, online retailers are required to send the customer's name, address and purchase amount to the state Department of Revenue.

It rarely happens that way at the hundreds of Web sites dealing in cheap smokes, state officials say.

Senecasmokes.com boasts that it ''does not report to any state taxation or tobacco department.''

The practice is hard to trace, harder to prosecute and costs states billions of dollars in lost revenue.

A report by the General Accounting Office, Congress' research arm, predicts revenue from Internet cigarette sales will reach $5 billion by 2005, costing states about $1.4 billion in lost revenue.

It's too soon for state officials to say, in dollars, how much Internet sales will swipe from tax revenue.

Anthony Beccone, director of Pennsylvania's Office of Criminal Tax Investigation, said his department is trying to head off the problem. Agents in Beccone's department are sending letters to about 500 Internet vendors, notifying them they must report their transactions in the state.

Making them follow the rules is the tough part, Beccone said.

The Cigarette Tax Enforcement unit has a staff of six, and the U.S. mail makes a convenient hiding place for transactions, he said.

If the violating vendor is in another state, the crime becomes a federal matter. But federal agencies have more pressing business, said Jim Crandall, a U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms spokesman.

''We're not as active as we would be if it were a felony,'' Crandall said. ''U.S. attorneys aren't looking to prosecute this. They have more traditionally evil criminals to worry about.''

1 posted on 08/20/2002 6:20:28 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Just another Joe; Gabz; Great Dane; Max McGarrity; Tumbleweed_Connection; red-dawg; RikaStrom; ...

2 posted on 08/20/2002 6:21:36 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
I'm still waiting for pipe smoking to make a comeback. You can get almost any grade of tobacco for $2 - $10 / ounce, precisely control your nicotine intake, and only worry about tongue, throat, and mouth cancer (plus the other bad effects of nicotine). Cigarettes are too much of a pain in the @$$.
3 posted on 08/20/2002 6:32:02 AM PDT by FateAmenableToChange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
"We're not as active as we would be if it were a felony," Crandall said. "U.S. attorneys aren't looking to prosecute this. They have more traditionally evil criminals to worry about."

Anyone remember that rant from the witch lady in NYC about going after internet or out-of-state purchases? I think some goverment agencies will be agressively prosecuting tax avoiders.

5 posted on 08/20/2002 6:41:46 AM PDT by Dakmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
The idiocy of PA’s policies against smokers is hard to fathom. Try to balance the budget by jacking the tax on smokes, and drive people to find alternate sources. (A basic understanding of Economics would indicate this would happen)

At the same time inundate the population with the truly moronic “Compliance Alliance” campaign. Obviously the campaign is marketed towards teenagers, yet it’s stated purpose is to stop SHOP OWNERS from selling tobacco to teenagers. Seems to me if you wanted to get the attention of SHOP OWNERS you’d have a commercial with some bearded Paki marching in place in front of the Pakistani flag shouting “Allah commands you not to sell smokes to kids!” in Punjabi.

Gotta love that government…

Owl_Eagle

”Unleash the Hogs of Peace.”
P.J. O’Rourke Parliament of Whores

7 posted on 08/20/2002 6:43:23 AM PDT by End Times Sentinel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
Expect to see a crackdown soon on sellers of rolling machines and papers as "drug paraphernalia".
23 posted on 08/20/2002 8:01:01 AM PDT by Fresh Wind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SheLion
"It's too soon for state officials to say, in dollars, how much Internet sales will swipe from tax revenue."

Interesting choice of word here. Internet sales will "swipe" revenue from the government? As in stealing?

Citizens modifying their purchasing behaviour to avoid ridiculous taxes are now deemed criminals. Seems to me the government is the one "swiping", with these outrageous taxes!

35 posted on 08/20/2002 4:54:52 PM PDT by Bob Mc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson